News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

In refuges, staffers become a rarer species

Cuts force federal wildlife sanctuaries in N.C. to rely on volunteers

- Staff Writer

Published: Thu, Feb. 08, 2007 12:00AM

Modified Thu, Feb. 08, 2007 05:08AM

Bookmark and Share email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

Visitors attending nighttime field trips to hear red wolves howl will pay a fee for the first time. Students will miss annual outings at Pocosin Lakes National Wildlife Refuge. And a visitors center built in 2002 will open only for limited hours, relying on volunteers for staff.

Such pinched services are the effect of mounting staff cuts at national wildlife refuges in North Carolina and throughout the Southeast, as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services restructures to contend with flat budgets.

Cuts to the refuge system come at the same time that the Bush administration is proposing increases for other open spaces -- notably national parks. President Bush was in the Blue Ridge Mountains of Virginia on Wednesday, emphasizing his recommendation to increase funding for the National Park Service to $2.4 billion, in preparation for the service's centennial in 2016.

THE NATION'S TREASURES

WILDLIFE REFUGES: A network of 547 national wildlife refuges comprising 96 million acres exists throughout the United States for the preservation of animals, fish, birds and plants. Each year, millions of birds use them as rest areas and wintering grounds as they migrate thousands of miles south for winter and return north for summer. Public access and overnight camping is limited.

NATIONAL PARKS: These form a network of nearly 400 natural, cultural and recreational sites across the nation that have been set aside under special preservation and protection. They typically are designed to encourage and accommodate visitors. North Carolina has 13 National Park Service attractions.

NATIONAL FORESTS: Managed by the U.S. Forest Service, these are multi-purpose lands that provide camping and recreation for people, provide habitat for animals and are managed for timber production. There are 155 national forests, including the Nantahala, Pisgah, Croatan and Uwharrie forests in North Carolina.

But refuges would not fare as well under Bush's proposed budget, compounding several years of flat or declining investment.

North Carolina has 10 refuges to protect animals, birds and fish. Most are in Eastern North Carolina along the flyways of migratory waterfowl. Since 2003, the state's refuges have lost 10 permanent positions -- a 12 percent reduction. Nine more positions at five refuges are slated to go by 2009 through retirements and attrition.

The personnel losses mean scaled-back services, less upkeep on roads and other amenities and fewer wildlife surveys to gauge the health and diversity of animal populations.

"When you talk about cutting nearly a quarter of the staff out of North Carolina refuges, that is devastating," said Noah Matson, refuge programs manager for Defenders of Wildlife, an environmental advocacy group. "The entire system is in crisis right now."

The cuts are part of a broader restructuring plan at the 128 Southeastern wildlife refuges from Florida to Louisiana, which attract 11 million visitors a year. The Fish and Wildlife Service, faced with declining budgets, plans to phase out 87 positions in the Southeast in the next five years. That is on top of 68 positions abolished in the region over the last two years.

President Bush's proposed 2008 budget would spend $398.4 million for the national refuge system, an increase of 3.3 percent from current fiscal year, according to the Department of Interior.

Given projected flat or slightly declining budgets for refuges through 2011, combined with cost-of-living increases for staff and inflationary costs, the refuge system is having to shrink to maintain money for operations.

A budget like ice

"We've been doing more with less for a long time," said Mike Bryant, manager of the Alligator River and Pea Island Wildlife Refuges in Eastern North Carolina. "I think we've reached a point where we have to accept that we now will do less with less."

"It's almost like watching an ice sculpture melt slowly," Bryant said.

Tom MacKenzie, a spokesman for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Atlanta, said the refuge system has been competing for federal dollars with national priorities such as the war in Iraq, Hurricane Katrina relief and homeland security. Faced with shrinking budgets, the refuges developed a plan for an orderly reduction in staffing.

"Before we came up with the plan, we had been doing a hodge-podge of not filling jobs," MacKenzie said. "It made a quilt pattern of some refuges being better off than others."

The refuges, on public lands, try to provide as many free programs as possible. As staffs shrink, volunteer groups have increasingly stepped in to lead educational programs, but often charging a fee to offset costs.

Staff writer Wade Rawlins can be reached at 829-4528 or wrawlins@newsobserver.com.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.