News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Extension sought for nuclear plant

Published: Nov 15, 2006 12:00 AM
Modified: Nov 15, 2006 02:51 AM

Extension sought for nuclear plant

Progress Energy wants 20 years

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
Progress Energy applied for a nuclear license extension Tuesday to continue operating the Shearon Harris plant in southwestern Wake County for an additional 20 years.

The Raleigh utility's relicensing application sets the stage for a two-year review during which nuclear critics hope to turn Shearon Harris into the nation's first nuclear plant to fail to win a license renewal.

Progress Energy officials say the Shearon Harris plant is needed to meet growing energy demand. The company won a license extension for its Brunswick plant near Wilmington this summer, and relicensed the H.B. Robinson plant in South Carolina two years ago.

The Harris plant's license is scheduled to expire in 2026. The license extension would allow Progress Energy to operate the plant through 2046.

The license renewal process is expected to take between 22 and 30 months. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will hold at least five public meetings near the site of the nuclear plant. The first meeting could be as early as next month.

The N.C. Waste Reduction and Awareness Network in Durham and the Nuclear Information and Resource Service in Maryland have vowed to challenge the Shearon Harris application.

N.C. WARN alleges problems in such areas as fire safety, backup cooling, emergency planning and on-site security. The group has called Shearon Harris one of the most unsafe nuclear plants in the country, a claim disputed by Progress Energy and the NRC.

"Our primary goal is to persuade Progress Energy or the regulatory agency to require correction of these various safety and security problems," said Jim Warren, director of N.C. WARN. "This plant is too dangerous, and nuclear power is inherently too dangerous."

N.C. WARN has been emboldened by coalitions in three states that are opposing nuclear plant relicensing applications in Massachusetts, New Jersey and Vermont. The opponents in those states include attorneys general and state environmental agencies.

Staff writer John Murawski can be reached at 829-8932 or murawski@newsobserver.com.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company