News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Ads sit beside Va. stories

Search for 'shooting' lures readers to news Web sites

- The Associated Press

Published: Thu, Apr. 19, 2007 12:00AM

Modified Thu, Apr. 19, 2007 02:42AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

If you did a Google search for "Virginia Tech shooting" or "Virginia shooting" this week, the Internet search engine served up dozens of links to news about the massacre.

But some media outlets weren't taking the chance of missing readers' attention by being bumped down the list.

The New York Times and The Washington Post bought keyword ads that put their coverage into the prominent "sponsored links" atop the Google results page. So did The First Post, a British online news magazine. The Times, CNN and Fox News got similar links up on Yahoo; Fox News also mined MSN.

Buying keyword ads to run alongside search engine results is an established practice. Companies in and out of the media do it when sporting events or TV shows turn something into a hot topic.

But for top-tier news organizations to advertise their Virginia Tech coverage this way illuminates the power that the Web wields in the traditional media. No longer can the Times or the Post assume that readers would naturally come to them, even when a huge event breaks.

"An increasing number of users go directly to a search engine when news breaks rather than going to a news site," said Peter Hershberg, managing partner of Reprise Media, a search marketing company.

As a result, news organizations want to have an analogue to last century's newsboys in knickers who barked out "Extra! Extra!" on urban street corners:

"Shooting at Virginia Tech," the underlined link for the Times read. "The New York Times has the latest news and updates."

"Special Report on Va Tech Shootings," CNN's link proclaimed. "Timeline of the tragedy and reports from VA Tech students."

"America mourns college gun rampage massacre. News, analysis, pics here," said The First Post's come-on.

Grabbing readers

Representatives for the Times and the Post said their organizations regularly buy keyword ads in hopes of grabbing readers who might not otherwise check out their Web sites. They declined to share how much they spend on such campaigns.

The costs can vary wildly: Generally, search ads are automatically generated based on how many nickels or dimes a sponsor is willing to pay the Internet companies every time someone checks out the link.

Google and Yahoo, the top two search engines, factor in how frequently the ads are clicked. The goal is to increase the odds that the sponsored links will be relevant to what the Web surfer was exploring.

It's not foolproof: In addition to the news ads on Yahoo on Wednesday, "Virginia shooting" at times returned a link sponsored by the FFF Hunting Preserve, touting its "9 station range Shooting course in Virginia."

One potential problem for news organizations is that keyword ads "can also leave you looking crass -- that you're tapping in for a business purpose on a tragedy," said Danny Sullivan, editor of SearchEngineLand.com, a newsletter. "It could make some people's eyebrows go up ... 'Did you have to go after that particular term?' "

But Sullivan said that if news sites have "substantial information" to share about a search term -- even if that information is, after all, a commercial product -- "I would err on their side of that -- that it's not so bad."

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.