News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

New in paperback

The latest releases

The New York Times

Published: Wed, Nov. 28, 2007 12:00AM

Modified Wed, Nov. 28, 2007 06:45AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

"What Was Asked of Us: An Oral History of the Iraq War by the Soldiers Who Fought It," by Trish Wood (Back Bay/Little, Brown). Wood, a Canadian investigative reporter, interviewed 29 American veterans of the Iraq war. The men and women came from different personal and ideological backgrounds, but their descriptions of their experience all display a sense of duty and courage in the face of war's violence.

"Ooga-booga," by Frederick Seidel (Farrar, Straus & Giroux). The poems in Seidel's 14th book, dealing with such subjects as sexual prowess and the Bush administration, are "as beguiling and magisterial as anything the septuagenarian jet-setter has written," Joel Brouwer, the reviewer for The New York Times, said.

"What Paul Meant," by Garry Wills (Penguin). Wills turns the standard reading of early Christianity on its head by arguing that Paul, more than the four canonical Gospels, should be recognized as the most reliable guide to Jesus' teachings. He suggests that the Roman hierarchy in the Middle Ages denied the egalitarianism of Jesus' and Paul's intentions.

"Through the Children's Gate: A Home in New York," by Adam Gopnik (Vintage). Gopnik, a staff writer for The New Yorker, left Paris with his wife and children in late 2000 for the upper-middle-class Manhattan of play dates and private schools. He describes that world in these essays: "In the end, ordinary life, sheltered from the abysmal winds of History, is what we all hope to preserve as long as the universe will allow."

"Visual Shock: A History of Art Controversies in American Culture," by Michael Kammen (Vintage). This well-researched study of "the nature, diversity and persistence of major disputes generated by art" since the 1830s raises questions about the expectations of art in a democratic society. Kammen, a professor of American history and culture at Cornell University, looks at public controversies over war memorials (from the Washington Monument to Maya Lin's commemoration of the Vietnam War) and public decency (from Thomas Eakins to Robert Mapplethorpe).

"Brave Enemies," by Robert Morgan (Shannon Ravenel/Algonquin). During the last year of the American Revolution, this novel's 16-year-old heroine murders the stepfather who raped her and takes to the western North Carolina road dressed as a boy. She falls in with a traveling preacher who discovers her true sex, marries her and is promptly forced into the British cavalry. They meet again at the site of an important clash in January 1781.

"Madhouse: A Tragic Tale of Megalomania and Modern Medicine," by Andrew Scull (Yale University). Henry Cotton, the director of Trenton State Hospital from 1907 to 1930, had a bizarre theory of insanity: that it was caused by bacterial infection. Soon he was removing not only his patients' teeth and tonsils but also their stomachs and colons. Although the death rate passed 30 percent, Cotton was protected by a powerful mentor who suppressed the evidence against him.

"Dangerous Nation," by Robert Kagan (Vintage). Americans were never the innocents they imagined themselves, particularly in matters of foreign policy, according to Kagan, a trans-Atlantic fellow of the German Marshall Fund. In the first of two volumes on the United States as an international power, Kagan argues that from the first days of the Republic, America was a player on the world scene, and that domestic and foreign concerns were always intertwined.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.