News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Budget's here; quarrel to follow

Nation & World

Published: Feb 06, 2007 12:00 AM
Modified: Feb 06, 2007 06:30 AM

Budget's here; quarrel to follow

Democrats poised to pick at Bush's $2.9 trillion plan

Story Tools

WINNERS AND LOSERS

Some agencies would win big under President Bush's fiscal 2008 budget proposal, while others would be slashed.

WINNERS

DEFENSE DEPARTMENT: $624.6 billion, a 4.1 percent increase over 2007. The Army would get $130.1 billion, a 20.4 percent increase. An additional $37.6 billion would go to fix or replace equipment destroyed in battle.

VETERANS AFFAIRS: $84.4 billion, a 13.3 percent increase over 2007. The VA will treat nearly 263,000 Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans; the budget seeks $36.6 billion for medical care, including $3 billion for mental health.

STATE DEPARTMENT: $37.4 billion, a 12.9 percent increase over 2007. Seeks to triple funding for the Millennium Challenge Corp., to $3 billion. Millennium provides aid to 11 fledgling democracies.

INTERIOR DEPARTMENT: $10.1 billion, a 4.1 percent increase over 2007. Seeks $1.9 billion for national parks, a 13 percent increase, including 40 percent more for daily park operations than when Bush took office.

LABOR DEPARTMENT: $50.4 billion, a 7.9 percent increase over 2007.

LOSERS:

AMTRAK: Seeks $800 million, $500 million less than fiscal 2007.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY: $7.1 billion, a 4.9 percent cut.

LOW INCOME HOME ENERGY ASSISTANCE: Seeks $1.8 billion, down from $3.2 billion, a 56 percent cut.

CORPORATION FOR PUBLIC BROADCASTING: Seeks $350 million, down from $460 million in fiscal 2007.

EDUCATION DEPARTMENT: Seeks $62.6 billion, a 5 percent cut.

LABOR DEPARTMENT'S BUREAU OF INTERNATIONAL LABOR AFFAIRS: Would cut from $73 million to $14 million, nearly 81 percent.

OFFICE OF DISABILITY EMPLOYMENT POLICY: Cut from $28 million to $19 million, or 32 percent.

CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION: Cut by $550 million.

McCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS

WHERE THE PRESIDENT AND THE DEMOCRATS WILL LIKELY CLASH

Several big proposals in President Bush's fiscal 2008 budget are lightning rods for controversy, among them:

EXTENDING HIS FIRST-TERM TAX CUTS: This would cost the Treasury about $1.6 trillion over 10 years. Newly empowered Democrats in Congress have made it clear that they intend to let tax reductions for the very wealthy expire in 2010. The question is where they'll draw the line on income: $500,000? $250,000? This conflict will color the politics of budget-making until 2010, at least.

PAYING FOR WAR: Bush's request would drive the total cost of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to $661.9 billion through fiscal 2008. Democrats say the president asks too much. They promise rigorous oversight and may put strings on what money they do grant in a bid to end the Iraq war.

HEALTH-CARE FUNDS: Bush proposes to trim the growth rate of spending on Medicare to save $66 billion over five years and $25 billion from Medicaid. Democrats defend both programs and talk of "investing" more in health care.

CHILDREN'S HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAM: The president proposes to increase spending by $1 billion a year for five years. Democrats say that's not nearly enough. This program is an early battleground in coming partisan warfare over overhauling national health insurance.

SQUEEZING DOMESTIC PROGRAMS. Bush proposes to eliminate or slash spending on 141 federal programs, mostly domestic, to save $12 billion over five years. Congress rejected virtually all these cuts the past two years, and Congress now is run by Democrats, who are even less likely to reduce them.

BALANCING THE BUDGET BY 2012. Both the president and the Democratic-led Congress set this goal, but offer very different means. Bush wants low taxes, high spending on the military and belt-tightening everywhere else. Democrats want to end some of his high-end tax cuts, give the military smaller increases and direct more spending into health care, education and other domestic needs. Reaching a balanced budget by 2012 would require large compromises on taxes and spending, unusual spending discipline from both sides, a healthy economy and luck.

McCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS

HIGHLIGHTS

President Bush's proposed fiscal 2008 budget's main points:

* $2.9 trillion total, a 4.2 percent increase over this year.

* $93.4 billion more for war costs in Iraq and Afghanistan in fiscal 2007; $141.7 billion for war costs in fiscal 2008. To date Congress has enacted $426.8 billion for war costs. This request would drive the total to $661.9 billion through fiscal 2008. For fiscal 2009, $50 billion is marked as a placeholder .

* $624.6 billion for defense.

* $36.6 billion for medical care for U.S. veterans, up 83 percent since 2001. Includes $3 billion for improved mental health services.

* Making his first-term tax reductions permanent, costing the Treasury $1.6 trillion over 10 years.

* Cutting $66 billion from projected Medicare costs over five years by slowing the growth of payments to health-care providers and charging wealthy beneficiaries higher premiums. Medicare spending still would grow at a 6.7 percent annual rate rather than a now-projected 7.4 percent annual rate.

* Cut projected Medicaid spending by $25 billion over five years.

* Eliminate or sharply reduce funding for 141 other programs to save $12 billion over five years.

* Deficits of $239 billion in fiscal 2008, down from $244 billion this year and $248 billion in 2006.

* Balancing the budget by fiscal 2012.

McCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS

AP NEWS VIDEO


Requires Internet Explorer
Advertisements
WASHINGTON - President Bush's proposed 2008 federal budget landed with a thud Monday on Capitol Hill as Democrats prepared to rewrite his $2.9 trillion spending plan.

Setting the stage for a potentially bitter struggle over priorities, Democrats said Bush's proposal tilted too much toward war, national security and tax cuts.

His request for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan would drop to a combined $141.7 billion next year from $163.4 billion this year, The Associated Press reported.

Add Afghanistan, and U.S. taxpayers would have spent $662 billion on both wars through next year.

The war costs would contribute to a record $624 billion spending package for the Pentagon next year, with generous support for big weapons systems.

Bush won a series of tax cuts during his first term. But for the first time, he sent his budget to a Congress controlled by Democrats, and they made it clear that they didn't much like it.

"I doubt that Democrats will support this budget, and frankly, I will be surprised if Republicans rally around it either," said Rep. John Spratt, D-S.C., the chairman of the House Budget Committee.

"The day of the blank check for the president for the war is over," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

What does it mean for you?

The budget would touch average Americans in myriad ways.

* The president's plan would permanently extend tax reductions that now are set to expire in 2010, a change that would reduce anticipated tax revenues by $1.6 trillion over the next 10 years.

* The budget would boost spending on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid by 1 percent, well below the current 2.5 percent annual inflation rate.

* Vacationers might find better facilities at national parks as a result of the president's plan to increase spending for park improvements.

* Amtrak train riders would pay more if Congress approves his plan to phase out federal subsidies, although that doesn't seem likely.

* Tax cheats could find themselves in big trouble as a result of Bush's plan to spend $440 million additional on tax enforcement.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company