News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Scots rout English again

Nation & World

Published: Feb 02, 2008 12:30 AM
Modified: Feb 02, 2008 04:51 AM

Scots rout English again

Library of Congress caves on reclassifying Burns' works

Story Tools

THE BARD

Robert Burns (1759-1796) wrote hundreds of poems and songs in the Scots language, a Scottish dialect and in English. Among his best known is "Auld Lang Syne," traditionally sung at the New Year. Fans celebrate his birthday each year on Jan. 25 with Burns Dinners.

Among his works:

On Politics

In Politics if thou would'st mix,

And mean thy fortunes be;

Bear this in mind,-be deaf and blind,

Let great folk hear and see.

Bonie Dundee

My blessin's upon thy sweet wee lippie!

My blessin's upon thy e'e-brie!

Thy smiles are sae like my blythe sodger laddie,

Thou's aye the dearer, and dearer to me!

But I'll big a bow'r on yon bonie banks,

Whare Tay rins wimplin' by sae clear;

An' I'll cleed thee in the tartan sae fine,

And mak thee a man like thy daddie dear.

OTHER FAMOUS SCOTTISH FIGURES

AP NEWS VIDEO


Requires Internet Explorer
Advertisements
WASHINGTON - The beloved Scottish bard Robert Burns would trowe in 'is marble mausoleum had he heard of how the Yankees wanted to characterize his poetry.

They called it ... English.

Have the folks at the U.S. Library of Congress never seen "Braveheart"?

Last year, the world's foremost cataloguing experts peered into their decimal systems and concluded that Scottish works should fall within the confines of English. The bureaucratic blunder incited an international scandal. And a mild-mannered lawmaker from wee North Carolina became a hero to Scots of literary bent -- making deals on the moors over salmon and fine Scotch whisky, wielding congressional might like the swords of his ancestors.

Any historian worth his bagpipes knows of Scotland's bitterness after a bloody war in the late 1200s against the English monarchy.

"You can imagine the insult," said Mike McIntyre, North Carolinian, Scotsman, Democratic congressman and -- more on this later -- co-chairman of Congress' Friends of Scotland Caucus.

In the Tar Heel State resides perhaps the country's largest concentration of Scottish descendants, many near McIntyre's hometown of Lumberton. When McIntyre fights for the Scots, he figures, he fights for his constituents as well.

Ah, but what a foe he faced.

The U.S. Library of Congress rises, literally and figuratively, as one of the greatest troves of catalogued knowledge in the world. More than 138 million volumes rest there, adjacent to the U.S. Capitol, each stamped with its own identifying classification. Flip to the back of the title page of most any book, and you'll see it: a coded series of dashed letters and numerals as unique as a snowflake.

Last spring, the experts decided to rejigger the system -- putting Scottish, Welsh and Irish works together under the larger "English" heading.

"This was not a matter of ethnicity," said Library of Congress spokesman Matt Raymond. "This was a matter of language."

This was seen as a bad idea.

"It was quite a big deal," said Stuart McLean, second secretary for Scottish affairs in the British Embassy in Washington.

As the U.S. Library of Congress goes, so goes the world. Its catalogue influences libraries worldwide, and so the Scots found their heritage and system suddenly, ah, scotched.

"That was a scandal," said Patrick Scott, who runs the world's largest collection of Scottish works outside Scotland, at the University of South Carolina. "It was outrageous."

No one suggested drawing torrents of blood as did Scotland's rebel martyr William Wallace -- the character Mel Gibson played in the movie "Braveheart" -- but many literary types felt a sting.

Overseas, the National Library of Scotland learned of the change. So did the London Times, which gleefully scoffed with a splashy story in December.

"You realize, there is a distinct heritage of Scottish literature, poetry, Scottish songs," McIntyre said. "This was a no-brainer. The Library of Congress doesn't need to be telling Scotland how to classify their literature."

The Library of Congress decided quietly to reverse its decision.

Then, nothing. No official word arrived to soothe restless Scottish hearts.

As it happened, McIntyre was traveling to the windswept highlands in early January on other matters. And in McIntyre, Scotland had a great champion.

Two years ago, McIntyre founded the Friends of Scotland Caucus. Its chief achievement was passing a resolution for a National Tartan Day (which is April 6).

On the evening of Jan. 10, McIntyre and other congressmen dined in Edinburgh with Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond. The first minister had heard the Library of Congress was changing its mind and restoring Burns, his vernacular poetry and the rest of Scottish literature to its rightful place. Could McIntyre persuade them to make it official?

Warrior wields weapon

So, in the manner of Scotland's medieval warriors, McIntyre drew his weapon: the telephone.

He called his office, which called the Library of Congress, which called the Scottish affairs office at the British Embassy. Memos were written, signatures scrawled, faxes sent -- all within hours.

Just as Robert the Bruce routed the English at the Battle of Bannockburn in 1314, so McIntyre carried the day.

"The Library ... has decided to reinstate all the previously existing headings for Scottish literature and Scottish poetry," wrote James H. Billington, the librarian of Congress, in his letter to the National Library of Scotland.

In Edinburgh, they held a news conference the next day. The Times of London ran a front-page story.

The victory, McLean said, is perhaps the most tangible example yet of why Scotland needs friends on Capitol Hill.

Even McIntyre marveled.

"That's the quickest action of any caucus I've been involved in," he said.

bbarrett@mcclatchydc.com or (202) 383-0012
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company