News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Wake rejects touch-screen voting

Ryan Teague Beckwith, staff writer

Published: Mon, Feb. 13, 2006 05:45PM

Modified Mon, Feb. 13, 2006 06:16PM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

Wake County voters will stick with paper ballots.

County commissioners decided today to buy new optical-scan ballot counters and rejected a proposal for 13 additional touch-screen voting machines.

The decision led to applause from verified voting activists, who had questioned the touch-screen machines’ reliability.

Like other North Carolina counties, Wake’s machines were decertified last year based on new state and federal standards. The county must buy all new machines in time for the May 2 primary.

Last week, the county’s Board of Elections requested that commissioners approve using optical-scan ballots on Election Day and touch-screen machines for early voting.

They were concerned that hand-sorting the paper ballots from early voting would be cumbersome and could lead to security problems. Touch- screen machines would sort the results automatically.

The touch-screen machines, which are similar to an ATM, are used in Mecklenburg and Guilford counties, but have never been tried in Wake.

Voting activists argued that the touch-screen machines would be more expensive and less reliable. They said the machines’ thermal paper trail would not withstand the rigors of a recount.

“Why spend extra money for a dubious and experimental technology?” said Andrew Silver, 64, a Cary epidemiologist.

Commissioner Phil Jeffreys, a retired postal worker, said he was not concerned about the difficult of hand-sorting an estimated 90,000 ballots after next fall’s Election Day.

“I worked in a post office for 30 years and it’s not a lot (to sort),” he said.

County commissioners unanimously rejected the proposal and approved a second request from the elections board to request all optical-scan ballot counters.

John Gilbert, chairman of the elections board, said that hand- counting would be a temporary solution. He predicted that the county’s vendor would eventually improve its ballot-counting machines, making hand-sorting unnecessary.

If not, he said the county can always switch to touch-screen machines later.

Staff writer Ryan Teague Beckwith can be reached at 836-4944 or Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.