'); } -->
WASHINGTON - Today marks the 40th anniversary of the signing of the federal Freedom of Information Act, but open-government advocates say there is little to celebrate.
The historic law is widely seen as broken. The backlog of requests is growing, with some Americans waiting years for information from government agencies.
Each administration since 1966 has used every tool at its disposal to thwart disclosure of information that it deems dangerous or embarrassing. The Bush administration is no different, often citing the changed security environment after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks as justification for secrecy.
The U.S. Freedom of Information Act is a law ensuring public access to U.S. government records. FOIA carries a presumption of disclosure; the burden is on the government to substantiate why information may not be released. Agencies of the United States government, upon written request, are required to disclose those records, unless they can be lawfully withheld from disclosure under one of nine specific exemptions in the FOIA.
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY'S NATIONAL SECURITY ARCHIVE
"The marching orders are now: If there's a basis to withhold, do it," said Elizabeth Withnell, chief counsel at the Department of Homeland Security's Privacy Office.
The law, commonly known as FOIA, presumes that federal records will generally be available to the public. But Congress gave agencies nine broad exemptions they could use to withhold records from the public, including the press.
An analysis of annual FOIA reports from 13 Cabinet-level departments shows that between 2000 and 2004, fully granted FOIA requests fell by 27 percent.
Increasingly, agencies are relying on one of several "executive privilege" claims to deny the release of data and documents.
Open-government advocates say agencies are now using creative interpretations of the FOIA exemptions to conceal as much information as possible.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.