News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Many options, little time for Dix plan

Published: Feb 04, 2007 12:00 AM
Modified: Feb 04, 2007 06:27 AM

Many options, little time for Dix plan

Redeveloping a mental hospital can go well, other cities prove.

Story Tools

Advertisements
Built on a grassy hill overlooking downtown Raleigh in 1856, the Dorothea Dix state hospital was one of the first major psychiatric institutions in the country.

It won't be first to close.

Around the United States, dozens of hospitals like Dix have shut down in recent years. Lawmakers and city leaders have struggled with what to do with the properties afterward.

Some have been successes.

In Athens, Ohio; Traverse City, Mich.; and Fergus Falls, Minn.; hospital campuses were given new life with museums, restaurants and offices. Historic buildings were saved, and vacant land kept open for parks.

Others have been struggles.

In Northampton and Danvers, Mass., and Pittsburgh, Pa., hospitals sat empty while communities argued over their fates. Historic buildings were demolished and controversial new construction planned.

Those who have studied other former hospitals say decisions made by the legislature and the city of Raleigh over the next few months about money, maintenance and management will determine what happens years from now.

If funding isn't found, the land will probably be sold to the highest bidder. If historic buildings aren't maintained properly, they will eventually be torn down. And if the public doesn't have a say in the site's future, whatever happens will prove contentious.

"You've got to have a plan immediately," said Kate Allen, a New York construction manager who has studied former hospitals.

So far, the debate in Raleigh hasn't gone well. Eight different proposals have been put forward for the 300-acre property, and all have been criticized for different reasons. Advocates for a major park have clashed with city leaders and state lawmakers.

And no one has answered three questions that will determine the future of Dix Hill.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company