'); } -->
The state House on Wednesday overwhelmingly voted to give district and superior court judges the right to carry a concealed handgun into court for their protection.
Though the bill had been filed long before the mass killings at Virginia Tech this week, the slayings of 32 students and faculty and wounding of a dozen others by a lone gunman became fodder for strong debate by supporters and opponents of the legislation.
Some argued that fewer might have died on the campus if students and faculty had been allowed to carry firearms, while others contended that more deaths would have occurred.
"This is a bad week to do this [bill]," said Rep. Maggie Jeffus, a Greensboro Democrat.
The bill also brought the surprising claim from one lawmaker that judges are already bringing guns into state courtrooms for their protection.
"In my experience in the courtroom, there's a lot of judges who are already bringing a concealed weapon to court," said Rep. Tim Spear, a Washington County Democrat and retired state Superior Court clerk. "I fully support that."
One of the legislation's chief sponsors, Rep. Arthur Williams, a Washington Democrat, said a courthouse shooting in Atlanta that killed a judge and a courtroom employee two years ago helped prompt the legislation, along with requests from individual judges. He said that judges associations had not requested the legislation.
The debate quickly focused on whether the legislation would protect judges or put others in the courtroom at risk.
Some backers said the judges, particularly those in rural areas, are exposed to threats while entering and exiting courthouses. Others said the training the judges would be required to receive was not enough to ensure they would not make a hasty decision and shoot an innocent bystander.
The legislation requires judges to obtain a permit to carry a concealed weapon, which requires eight hours of firearms training.
House members tentatively passed the legislation 91-20. They must take another vote before the legislation can move to the state Senate for consideration.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.