'); } -->
DURHAM -- A grand jury Monday indicted two Duke University lacrosse players in connection with a woman's allegations that three men raped her at a team party.
Durham lawyer Bob Ekstrand, who represents more than 30 lacrosse players, confirmed the charges but would not identify the players named in sealed indictments or say what crimes they are accused of.
Superior Court Judge Ronald Stephens filed a manila envelope containing the sealed indictments shortly after a grand jury finished its business Monday afternoon. Stephens, in an order scrawled on the back of the envelope, cited a little-used state law that allows him to keep the charges secret until a suspect is arrested or goes before a judge.
In a high-profile case where potential defendants have hired lawyers, a prosecutor might seek a sealed indictment to give those charged a chance to surrender before the indictment is made public, said District Attorney Jim Woodall, prosecutor for Chatham and Orange counties.
Prosecutors also might ask for a sealed indictment to protect an investigation, hoping the person charged might offer evidence against others. This is common in complex conspiracy cases such as racketeering investigations.
To obtain a sealed indictment, a prosecutor simply needs to ask the Superior Court judge presiding over the case -- either in open court or in chambers, Woodall said. Seals are temporary, said Richard Myers II, an assistant law professor at UNC-Chapel Hill. Once those indicted have been arrested, the indictment is usually made public.
The sealing of the indictments protracted a story that has played out in a clamorous court of public opinion, with race, class and sexual violence driving the debate. The accuser, 27, is black and a student at N.C. Central University, and she said she was raped by three white men.
On Monday, the judge refused to say why he sealed the charges. By 11:45 p.m., none of the players had been to the Durham County jail.
"Two young men have been charged with crimes they did not commit. This is a tragedy," Ekstrand said in a prepared statement. "For the two young men, an ordeal lies ahead. They do not face it alone; they face it with the love of family and friends and strengthened by the truth. They are both innocent."
Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong and other lawyers representing team members declined to comment.
The case has widened the divide between Duke University and Durham.
John Burness, the school's senior vice president for public affairs and government relations, said in a prepared statement that Duke officials had scant knowledge of Monday's events and that it would be inappropriate to comment before more particulars are known.
The case began March 14 when the woman who was hired to dance at the party told police that she was raped, sodomized, beaten and strangled in a bathroom.
The players, through their attorneys, said the accuser concocted the story. The players' attorneys say no rape, no assault and no sex occurred at the party.
The lawyers have said the accuser was drunk and already injured when she arrived at the three-bedroom house at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd. for the party late March 13. A judge ordered DNA tests on the team's 46 white players; he excluded the only black team member.
The players' attorneys say the tests showed none of the players' genetic material on or in the woman.
Nifong, bolstered by a medical exam that found injuries on the woman consistent with sexual assault, says he is confident that she was assaulted in the university-owned house. Nifong said last week at a forum at NCCU that the accuser identified at least one of her attackers.
Until Sunday night, the only other witness, the second woman hired to dance at the party, had remained silent. In television interviews, she told her story.
The woman's attorney, Mark Simeon of Durham, declined Monday to make her available for an interview. She spoke on the MSNBC cable news network, which did not identify her and showed her in silhouette. Simeon confirmed that it was his client on MSNBC.
The woman told MSNBC that she did not witness a rape and does not know whether one occurred.
The woman said she arrived thinking that she would be dancing at a bachelor party of 15 people. She was not expecting a party of lacrosse players, many of whom she said were in a drunken stupor. The woman said she was infuriated to learn that some players photographed her dancing.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.