'); } -->
When UNC-Chapel Hill leaders began to talk in the mid-1990s about a future fundraising campaign, they had so much respect for the B-word, they uttered it quietly. A "billion" dollars. It seemed audacious, almost arrogant.
No longer. More than 50 campuses across the United States have completed or are waging campaigns to raise $1 billion or more, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education. Stanford University raised more than $900 million just in 2006.
These days, universities campaign for money almost constantly. It is not uncommon for a large university to employ more than 100 people in development offices. Those workers conduct research on alumni, cultivate donors and "make the ask." Helped by a healthy economy and a great influx of wealth from the estates of the World War II generation, universities are reeling in donations with unparalleled success.
Multibillion-dollar campaigns are becoming more common at top universities. The Triangle's three major campuses have all raised more than $1 billion in their respective fund drives.
DUKE: $2.36 billion (1996 to 2003)
N.C. STATE: $1.05 billion so far (2001 to 2008)
UNC-CHAPEL HILL: $2 billion (1999 to 2007)
The evidence was clear this month when a string of big contributions rained down on Triangle campuses.
Two weeks ago, Duke University announced gifts of $15 million each from the Charlotte-based Duke Endowment and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to finance students' participation in community work and public service. Then, barely a week later, Duke snagged another $10 million in Gates money for scholarships.
Nine miles down the road, $100 million was donated to the private Morehead Foundation, which awards the prestigious Morehead Scholarship to top UNC-CH students. The donation -- one of the largest ever to any U.S. undergraduate scholarship program -- was made by the Gordon and Mary Cain Foundation in Texas. It was a tribute by Mary Cain to her late husband, who made a fortune in the petrochemical business. The famed Morehead Scholarship is now the Morehead-Cain Scholarship.
While the university absorbed that news, UNC-CH fundraisers planned a party with Carolina blue balloons and a cake and sugar cookies iced with the message, "$2 billion and counting."
Last week, a $50 million gift from a former biostatistics professor-turned-businessman inched the university's eight-year Carolina First Campaign beyond its $2 billion goal, 10 months early. The university thanked the donors, Quintiles Transnational CEO Dennis Gillings and his wife, Joan, by renaming the public health school the Dennis and Joan Gillings School of Global Public Health.
"There's just an enormous amount of wealth out there," said Paul Fulton, a UNC-CH trustee and co-chairman of the fund drive.
Since 1999, the campaign has attracted an average of $22 million a month. "Now think about that," Fulton said last week. "That's about $650,000 a day. It's kind of remarkable."
Alumni answer call
The key, Fulton said, is to match a donor's interest with some big project or need at the university, then make an aggressive pitch. And it works. "People are emotional about universities," he said at the campaign party last week. "They really connect with this place."
Alumni are responding as never before. A national survey of 1,014 colleges released last week showed that charitable contributions to higher education grew by 9.4 percent last year to $28 billion. Duke was ranked ninth in the country, with $332 million last year.
The study, by the New York-based Council for Aid to Education, showed that alumni giving jumped by 18 percent, even as the percentage of alumni who give has declined. Alumni participation slid from 12.4 percent in 2005 to 11.8 percent in 2006.
But those who give, give bigger.
In the current campaign, UNC-CH has received 366 gifts of more than $1 million, for 65 percent of the total.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.