News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Lawyer: Sheriff not liable in death

Chatham County

Published: Apr 17, 2007 12:00 AM
Modified: Apr 17, 2007 03:21 AM

Lawyer: Sheriff not liable in death

Slain woman's family sues, saying not enough was done to protect her

 

Story Tools

Advertisements
Shennel McCrimon McKendall's family says Chatham County Sheriff Richard Webster didn't work hard enough to confiscate a gun belonging to her estranged husband or to protect her - despite deputies' promises that they would do so.

On Nov. 29, 2004, Randy McKendall shot Shennel McKendall five times outside her office near UNC-Chapel Hill's Friday Center before putting the gun to his own head. Husband and wife both died.

In Chatham County Superior Court on Monday, Webster's attorney, Jim Secor, argued the wrongful death lawsuit filed by McKendall's family should be dismissed. Among other things, Secor said it was Randy McKendall's responsibility to turn over all weapons and ammunition after his wife secured a domestic violence protective order against him in November 2004.

Shennel McKendall had hoped the order would keep her safe. Instead, it began a 20-day downward spiral.

Randy McKendall was hospitalized after trying to commit suicide by overdosing on drugs, and jailed twice for violating the domestic protective order. He called his wife and threatened to commit suicide and is suspected of breaking into McKendall's home and shooting a television.

Still, Secor said Webster was acting within the law. He cited the domestic violence protective order statute that had been law for about a year when the shooting happened. It says: "The court shall order the defendant to surrender to the sheriff all firearms, machine guns, ammunition, permits to purchase firearms, and permits to carry concealed firearms that are in the care, custody, possession, ownership, or control of the defendant..."

"I don't read that as unbridled authority to go on a handgun search," Secor told the court.

But attorney Al McSurely, who represents Shennel McKendall's relatives, said the sheriff's internal guidelines can call for searches to find guns that are known about. In this case, McSurely said, the sheriff's office knew about the gun and had the ability to get it.

A sheriff's deputy promised McKendall someone would take it from her husband, McSurely said.

"He knew immediately they've been violating their own [standard operating procedures]," he said.

Secor argued that any promises were considered "words of comfort," not to be taken literally as promises for protection.

The same investigator told McKendall "the sheriff knows better and he could rely on the sheriff to do better," McSurely said. Despite promises to seize Randy McKendall's gun, the sheriff's department seized only a shotgun even though they found a shell casing from the 9 mm from the television shooting.

The lawsuit also includes claims that Webster treats black women's complaints of domestic violence abuse different from white women's.

Superior Court Judge Ken Titus said he would make a decision on whether the case could proceed by the end of the week.

Staff writer Jessica Rocha can be reached at 932-2008 or jessica.rocha@newsobserver.com.

All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company