The House voted 109-5 in favor of booting the Wilmington Democrat, who is accused of mishandling or hiding about $340,000 in loans and campaign and charitable contributions. At least 80 votes were needed to kick him out of office.

Wright was immediately escorted from the chamber by the House sergeant at arms. His attorney later promised to file a legal challenge to the House's action.

Wright, who faces a criminal trial later this month on similar charges, has denied wrongdoing and called the proceedings a rush to judgment by his peers. Wright asked his colleagues not to expel him, arguing that he couldn't adequately defend himself without revealing to prosecutors his criminal defense strategy.

"I am innocent of the criminal charges before me," Wright said. "However, I need an opportunity to prove that. This is less than the appropriate setting to do that."

After the vote, Speaker Joe Hackney said the House had to act.

"We in the House performed a sad duty today, but I want to say that I think it was a duty -- a duty to protect the House, protect the institution, to make it clear that the kind of conduct that the committee found to be true renders one unfit to be a member of the House," Hackney told reporters.

Hackney said that, regardless of what happens in criminal court, Wright owed it to fellow legislators to say why he did what he did. An acquittal would not change anything, he said.

"We did what we did based on our evidence," Hackney said. "Explanation to this House was due long before now."

Linda Daves, chairwoman of the state Republican Party, said she was sad about today's vote.

"This is a scene that was previously thought impossible in our state," she said in a statement. "However as more and more corruption is uncovered in state government, each new episode becomes emblematic of a widespread culture of corruption that has been allowed to fester in our state's capital."

She said she hoped it would inspire the Democratic leadership to work with Republican to pass "meaningful ethics reform" in the next session.

Earlier this month, a special House ethics committee recommended Wright be removed from office after hearing several days of testimony.

The bipartisan group of fellow House members concluded Wright failed to properly disclose $180,000 in campaign contributions, deposited $8,900 of charitable donations into his personal bank account, and persuaded a state official to write a bogus letter about a state grant that, according to testimony, Wright used to take out a bank loan for a foundation he led.

Rep. Rick Glazier, D-Cumberland, chairman of the ethics committee, told his colleagues before Thursday vote that Wright was given ample opportunity to present evidence during the hearing. Glazier said Wright filed 22 incorrect campaign reports since 2000 and failed to fix any of them.

"Forty percent of the dollars Representative Wright received for seven years was not reported," Glazier said. "In the end, there is nary a substantive (campaign reporting law) in the statutes that was not violated repeatedly by Representative Wright."

Glazier said the committee believed there was no choice but to seek expulsion because of the seriousness of the violations and Wright's lack of contrition.