News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Mandate irrelevant, doctors say

Published: Jan 28, 2006 12:00 AM
Modified: Jan 28, 2006 05:13 AM

Mandate irrelevant, doctors say

Black defends law as valuable tool

Marcia Brantley, preschool program director for Prevent Blindness North Carolina, waves in Abia Ahmed, 4, for her free vision screening at Amity United Methodist Nursery School in Chapel Hill on Thursday.

Story Tools

Related Content

Advertisements
A new law requiring that children have their vision tested by an eye specialist before they start kindergarten is being criticized as lacking foresight.

At least five counties, most in the rural northeastern corner of the state, don't have optometrists, who do vision exams and prescribe lenses to correct problems. Even in urban counties, parents wonder why they should pay $100 or more to replace the eye screenings their children get free or as part of routine medical check-ups.

Tiffany Taylor, a single mother from Raleigh, is worried about coming up with money to pay for an exam for her 4-year-old son, who will start kindergarten this year.

Taylor, 28, said she can't afford health insurance and is certain she won't qualify for money the state has set aside to help some parents pay for tests.

"I don't know why they put this hardship on people who can't afford eye exams," she said. "I usually trust my pediatrician to tell me if there's a problem or not. That's what they're there for."

The state's pediatricians agree.

The N.C. Pediatric Society is part of a coalition of education groups, doctors' lobbies and advocates for children and the poor who have asked legislators to repeal the law before school starts this fall. Most children won't need the eye exam, opponents say.

Legislators will have a chance to change the law or scrap it when they return to work in May.

In the meantime, Ken Wells, the school superintendent in Perquimans County, is trying to figure out how to get the 80 or so children expected to start kindergarten in his district this year to see an optometrist when the county doesn't have any.

In some other counties, children who will be required to get eye tests this year outnumber optometrists by more than 300 to 1.

Most Perquimans children will have to travel about 30 miles to see an optometrist, Wells said. And he points out that school nurses check children's vision.

"The need for this is just not apparent," Wells said.

Last year, House Speaker Jim Black, an optometrist, had the eye exam law written into the budget.

"Anybody who does not understand the importance of vision for children starting in kindergarten is not interested in kids," said Black, a Democrat from Mecklenburg County.

Kindergartners who don't have their eyes tested by an optometrist or ophthalmologist -- a medical doctor who specializes in the eyes -- before the first day of class would be shut out of school. That's a consequence more severe than the penalty for missing shots to prevent measles or polio; children who don't have all their immunizations by the time school starts have 30 days to get them.

But bludgeoned by complaints, Black said this week that he would push for some flexibility, so children who haven't had the eye exam on time can still go to class. Additionally, he would lift the requirement that eye doctors with North Carolina licenses do the exams. Some residents of rural border counties often cross state lines for medical care.

But school boards still don't like the law, even with those changes. They argue that pre-kindergarten health checks and immunizations, required by law, are available free at county health departments, no matter how much money a family has.

Requiring parents to pay for eye tests sets up a financial hurdle to education, said Leanne Winner, lobbyist for the N.C. School Boards Association. Black's proposal to give schoolchildren six months to get their eyes checked rather than requiring exams by the first day "only postpones the inevitable," she said.


Next page >

Staff writer Lynn Bonner can be reached at 829-4821 or lbonner@newsobserver.com.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Print Ads View all ads from past 7 days »

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company