'); } -->
Ever wish to slip unseen into forbidden places the way Harry Potter does under his invisibility cloak?
Or to materialize with no warning like Romulan warships in a Star Trek universe?
Now scientists at Duke University and Imperial College in London say such dreams are nearly within reach.
In a paper published online today by the journal Science, the Duke team delivers a blueprint for a real cloaking device. No one has the means, yet, to produce it. But for the first time, science has moved far enough to make one theoretically feasible, the scientists say.
"People are beginning to think differently," said Duke engineering professor David R. Smith.
Working with Sir John Pendry in London, Smith and fellow Duke physicist David Schurig envision new materials that could bend light around an object, creating the illusion that the object isn't there.
And they provide a detailed description of the qualities the new materials would need.
The three scientists come by this vision honestly. They are leading theorists and tinkerers in a new field creating "metamaterials." Borrowing building blocks and ultra-precise fabrication techniques from the electronics industry, they invent materials that break the laws of nature.
One example is the way invisible light bends after hitting surfaces. Not long ago, scientists thought this refracted light always goes in a predictable direction. But in 2000, Smith's team introduced a gridlike material that bends it in an unexpected way.
Many physicists were skeptical, even critical. But in 2003, after several labs confirmed the finding, Science listed it as one of the 10 research breakthroughs of the year. Smith, Pendry and collaborators won the European Descartes Research Prize.
In a second-floor lab at Duke's Pratt School of Engineering, they continue to build and test novel materials -- some gridlike structures, others flat. Funded partly by the Department of Defense, they see countless applications for products that might result.
Materials that make other objects invisible could do more than hide a spy plane, Schurig said. They could keep an ugly building -- say a coal plant -- from spoiling a beautiful view. Other sorts of cloaks could deflect destructive seismic waves or dangerous radiation from buildings, he said.
Greg Gbur, a UNC-Charlotte physicist who has read the Duke blueprint and an alternative design also published by Science, said huge challenges remain.
But "this shifts the idea of these devices from being intriguing but not really feasible to maybe being feasible," Gbur said.
Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.
The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.
Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.
If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.