News & Observer | newsobserver.com | Judge goes easy on 100-mph drivers

Published: May 20, 2007 04:38 AM
Modified: May 20, 2007 01:45 PM

Judge goes easy on 100-mph drivers

A Guilford County judge gives free passes to speeders going as fast as 115. He says he just takes them one case at a time

Story Tools

Interactive: Speed Calculator


Advertisements
GREENSBORO - Drivers caught rocketing along Guilford County highways at 100 mph or faster find forgiveness from Judge William "Pete" Hunter.

From January 2002 through June 2006, Hunter granted twice as many free passes to fast drivers as any other District Court judge in the state. He gave "prayers for judgment continued" 101 times, or in 74 percent of the high-speed cases he heard.

PJCs let speeders keep their licenses and avoid a rise in their insurance bills.

Among the 100 mph drivers excused in Hunter's court: teens caught racing, drivers who tried to dodge the officer, people with extensive histories of speeding -- and one previously at fault in a fatal crash.

Hunter defends his record, saying that he weighs a number of factors before granting such leniency.

"Whether I'm out of step with [other judges], I don't know," he said in an interview. "You know, I just deal with what is before me."

Hunter is not breaking any law. Judges have the discretion to delay judgment in most criminal cases. In speeding cases, there's no limit on what speeds can be forgiven with a PJC, and no requirement that the driver have a clean record.

State legislators could restrain judges who give these breaks. They have already blocked such judgments in other types of cases, such as driving while impaired or passing a stopped school bus, said Ralph A. Walker, director of the N.C. Administrative Office of the Courts.

Breaks given freely

Hunter, 64, is a registered Democrat, although elections for District Court judges are nonpartisan. He has served as a judge for more than 12 years. He left a job as a high school teacher and football coach to pursue law in the 1970s.

Most speeders deal with tickets in traffic court by talking with an assistant district attorney. Those who want to try their cases -- which is rare -- or those looking for a PJC come before a judge.

Hunter has handed out breaks liberally, sometimes without knowing a driver's record. The judge said prosecutors or defense lawyers generally show him the driver's history or tell him about it. He does not demand to see these records, however, and prior tickets don't prevent a PJC.

Of the 73 North Carolina drivers to whom Hunter gave breaks in 100 mph cases, 14 had four or more prior tickets. Thirteen have gotten three or more tickets since.

Among the high-speed cases in which Hunter granted a PJC:

* James Tompkins, 72, of Deep Gap, who was ticketed for driving 100 mph in 2005 on Interstate 40. Two years before, troopers accused him of killing a Charlotte woman in a car crash. He eventually pleaded guilty to reckless driving to endanger. Unable to stop, he veered across the center line and slammed into an oncoming car to avoid ramming the car in front of him. He did not return calls.

* Dennis Studer, 44, of Kernersville, who had already racked up 20 speeding tickets since 2001, including three over 90 mph. He went before Hunter in 2005 on a ticket for running 100 on a 55 mph stretch of N.C. 68. When the officer pulled him over, he was talking on his cell phone. Studer could not be reached.

* Alicia Cockman, 22, of Bear Creek, who pushed her car to 108 mph on U.S. 421 in a race with two teenage boys in 2004. Though only 19 at the time, Cockman had already been caught speeding three times. Hunter gave her and the two other racers a break; since then she has been ticketed for speeding four more times. Cockman could not be reached.

* Alexia Phillips, 41, of Durham, who was stopped on Interstate 85 by a trooper who clocked her at 104 mph. He cited her for having an expired license. She also had a 10-year-old child in the car. Phillips did not return calls.


Next page >

Staff writer Mandy Locke can be reached at 829-8927 or mandy.locke@newsobserver.com.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.


The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Print Ads View all ads from past 7 days »

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

Member of the
Real Cities Network

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company