News & Observer | newsobserver.com |

Developers might have to play by greener rules

- Staff Writer

Published: Sun, Dec. 31, 2006 12:30AM

Modified Sun, Dec. 31, 2006 02:52AM

Bookmark and Share
email this story to a friend E-Mail print story Print
Text Size:

tool name

close
tool goes here

CHAPEL HILL -- The town with some of the strictest development rules in the Triangle may soon make them even stricter.

The Chapel Hill Planning Department is working on new rules requiring green building practices in major development projects.

"It's time to not just encourage, but require," Town Council member Laurin Easthom wrote via e-mail to fellow Town Council member Jim Ward. "The bottom line is ... there is no wiggle room for the developers."

Ward and Easthom serve along with Mayor Pro Tem Bill Strom on the council's Sustainability, Energy and Environment Committee.

Energy efficiency was a sore spot for Easthom and Ward during the council's last meeting of the year Dec. 4. Easthom voted with the majority to direct Town Manager Roger Stancil to negotiate a contract with Ram Development Co. to build a 243,000-square-foot condominium and retail complex on a town-owned parking lot downtown.

Ward was the lone dissenter, arguing that the council should have required Ram to cut energy use by 20 percent compared to conventional buildings. He chided Easthom for voting for the contract even though she had spoken out for energy efficiency.

Ram has agreed to pursue basic certification through the U.S. Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design program. There are many ways to attain LEED certification, such as preserving open space or fostering alternative transportation. Ward wanted Ram to focus on the energy efficiency of the buildings and attain a higher LEED "Silver" rating. Ram president Casey Cummings has said his company cannot afford to do that.

Easthom now says she will vote against the contract in February if it does not include the 20 percent energy cut and a LEED Silver rating, and she wants to see that standard, or something like it, applied to all commercial and large multi-family building projects in Chapel Hill.

The Town Council has already decided that all new municipal buildings will be LEED Silver certified, and the town also offers faster reviews to developers who promise to achieve LEED Silver.

"Other cities have required ... new construction to at least be [LEED] silver certified, as part of their ordinances," Easthom wrote in the e-mail message, which is on file at Town Hall. "I'm hoping that Chapel Hill can do the same (or whatever level the council finds acceptable)."

Nick Tennyson, executive vice president of the Home Builders Association of Durham, Orange and Chatham Counties, cautioned against relying only on the LEED program.

"The town has the option of acknowledging and accepting a broad range of programs," said Tennyson.

"If they pick any single program as the answer, I think that would be a mistake and would be counterproductive."

Without having seen a proposal, Aaron Nelson, executive director of the Chapel Hill-Carrboro Chamber of Commerce, was reluctant to comment. He did say stricter regulations could drive up housing costs.

Over the past year, the average selling price of a house in Orange County was $316,418, about 25 percent higher than the average across the Triangle, according to the Raleigh Regional Association of Realtors.

"I think that there's a relationship between additional regulation and the ultimate cost to the consumer," Nelson said.

"Our challenge as a community is going to be balancing our priorities."

Staff writer Jesse James DeConto can be reached at 932-8760 or jdeconto@newsobserver.com.

Get it all with convenient home delivery of The News & Observer.

No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.