News & Observer | newsobserver.com | No postage on that pardon: He wants rare paper in hand

Published: Feb 03, 2007 12:30 AM
Modified: Feb 03, 2007 08:28 AM

No postage on that pardon: He wants rare paper in hand

Steve Snipes, wrongly convicted of robbing a Sanford-area store, becomes only the fourth person since Mike Easley became governor to experience official innocence in a pardon

Story Tools

Audio: Steve Snipes on his pardon


Snipes describes how it feels to be pardoned after years of maintaining his innocence.


Snipes describes what the pardon means to his future.

OUT OF 481 REQUESTS, THREE OTHER PARDONS FROM EASLEY

Case: Tried and convicted twice of murder, 1985, 1990.

Cleared: In 2003 when DNA evidence pointed to someone else, and another man confessed.

Pardoned: April 2004

Paid by state: $358,545.

Case: Convicted of rape in 1982.

Cleared: In 1991 after ruling that police improperly used hypnosis on the rape victim.

Pardoned: February 2001 after DNA tests exonerated him.

Paid by state: $90,000.

Case: The New Bern man was convicted in 1982 in a rape in Onslow County. The woman was raped in her home after she advertised a bed for sale.

Cleared: In 2003 based on DNA evidence.

Pardoned: 2005

N&O

Advertisements
RALEIGH - Steve E. Snipes wants to see the two-page pardon he got Friday from Gov. Mike Easley framed and hanging on a wall at his Sanford house.

It'll be a daily reminder of the nine years -- five of them spent in prison -- that Snipes spent trying to clear his name after being fingered as the masked robber of a Sanford-area convenience store.

"We got it! We got it, Mama!" Snipes told his wife, Chavala, when he saw the pardon. "Now my record can be cleared."

A jubilant Snipes arrived Friday morning with his wife and their 9-year-old son, Willis, at Easley's Office of Legal Counsel on West Jones Street to pick up the pardon of innocence, only the fourth given by Easley since he took office in 2001. The other three, involving two rape cases and a murder, all depended on DNA evidence for exoneration.

Snipes could have had the pardon mailed to him, but he chose to make the 40-mile trip to Raleigh after a 12-hour graveyard shift at the Sanford cotton mill where he works. He was looking forward to having the pardon handed to him at the office, but a press secretary for Easley gave the documents to Snipes' attorney, Paul Green, while Snipes talked to reporters outside about the time he spent wrongfully held in 17 prisons.

"I'm not the only one it happened to, and I'm probably not the last," Snipes said.

The application for a pardon, issued Tuesday, had been in Easley's hands since April 2004.

When asked what had taken so long, spokesman Seth Effron said only: "The process had been completed."

Easley, speaking to New York University law students Jan. 22, said he does not let his background as a prosecutor affect his decisions on clemency pleas.

"I can promise you that you look at these cases very differently as a governor than you do as a prosecutor," Easley said.

Snipes was actually released from prison in June 2003 after the Lee County district attorney decided to indict another man for the crime. The pardon, however, allows Snipes to seek compensation from the N.C. Industrial Commission -- $20,000 for each year spent in prison.

Since taking office in 2001, Easley has received 481 requests for pardons and granted four in his two terms (155 are pending), his office said. In former Gov. Jim Hunt's first two terms, 218 people were pardoned.

Getting a pardon is difficult, said Mary Ann Tally, who works with the Center for Death Penalty Litigation in Durham.

"I always tell people, 'That's a real long shot,' " Tally said. "You have to wonder about the number of innocent people in prison."

The Innocence Inquiry Commission, which Easley created last summer, began independent reviews of claims of wrongful convictions and is the first of its kind in the country.

Another man indicted

Snipes' son Willis, the youngest of his seven children, was 6 months old when Snipes was arrested after Thomas' Superette, a country store on N.C. 42 outside of Sanford, was robbed. Chavala Snipes would drive to wherever he was imprisoned, from the Tennessee to Virginia borders, for one-hour visits.

"I was dragging my son so he'd know who his daddy was," she said.

A new investigation by the State Bureau of Investigation, conducted at the request of Lee County District Attorney Tom Lock, found that a man named Terrance Wyatt had bragged about committing the crime, Green said. Wyatt was indicted but never convicted.

Snipes' original trial hinged on shaky evidence and testimony from store clerks who didn't see the robber's face but said he sounded like Snipes, an occasional customer, trying to disguise his voice. Friends and family members said Snipes was with them when the robbery occurred, but his attorney, Andre Barrett, later disbarred for stealing money from clients, never called them to testify.

After state and federal courts denied Snipes' appeals for a new trial, Green approached Lock, who had become a Superior Court judge, and asked him to take a fresh look at the case after Wyatt was arrested in connection with a similar robbery. Snipes was released from prison and his conviction overturned.

The push for the pardon of innocence was made so Snipes could seek compensation and be completely exonerated.

"Being not guilty is not the same thing as being innocent," Green said.

(Staff news researcher Brooke Cain contributed to this report.)

Staff writer Sarah Ovaska can be reached at 829-4622 or sovaska@newsobserver.com.

Get $150+ in coupons in every Sunday N&O. Click here for convenient home delivery.

Staff news researcher Brooke Cain contributed to this report.
No comments have been posted for this story. Log in to be the first to comment.
 

 

The News & Observer is pleased to be able to offer its users the opportunity to make comments and hold conversations online. However, the interactive nature of the internet makes it impracticable for our staff to monitor each and every posting.

Since The News & Observer does not control user submitted statements, we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted on our website. In addition, we remind anyone interested in making an online comment that responsibility for statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not The News and Observer.

If you find a comment offensive, clicking on the exclamation icon will flag the comment for review by the administrators, we are counting on the good judgment of all our readers to help us.

Hosting Partners of
newsobserver.com

A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company