Total pay still lags

June 16, 2009 

The N&O's lead story on June 14 ("Piled-up perks carry hidden costs") is an example of journalism that tries to lend clarity to an issue, but doesn't. The article states early that "While state employees and teachers annually do battle with lawmakers over pay raises and health benefits, other policies often passed to compensate for meager or no raises can quietly add tens of millions of dollars to the state's payroll in future years." The rest of the article is devoted to enumerating these generous benefits.

You offer no proof, however, that state employees' total pay (benefits plus salary) generally exceeds the compensation needed to retain enough employees to provide the services legislators believe North Carolinians demand. Indeed, the opposite may be true: a page at N.C. State's Web site shows, for example, that NCSU faculty rank below 13 of 16 peer institutions in average total compensation (benefits plus salary).

Cutting benefits means potentially uncompetitive total pay for state employees and unfilled positions or else cutting the quality of state-provided services.

Karlyn Mitchell

Associate Professor, Finance

N.C. State University


News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service