No change?

September 9, 2009 

Charles Krauthammer wrote, in his Aug. 28 column, what I thought was at least an attempt to offer a solution or alternative to the current health-care reforms being considered in Congress. He wrote of dropping the public option and de-emphasizing provisions such as the Medicare reimbursement for end-of-life consultations.

Just when I thought that an actual exchange of ideas might be happening, Krauthammer retreated to the worn-out cry of "rationing." As if it does not happen today, with caps on spending, limitations to network providers and larger and larger premiums that make care more difficult to attain than ever before.

I can only guess that Krauthammer likes things the way they are. As long as he can afford it, it isn't broken. After all, our health-care system is becoming an exclusive club, and we can't have riffraff coming in and ruining it for the members.

Scott Taylor

Garner

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service