Editorials

Now on Twitter: Follow the N&O editorial department at @NOopinionshop

Published Mon, Nov 09, 2009 02:00 AM
Modified Mon, Nov 09, 2009 06:43 AM

Trial run

Email Print Order Reprint
Share This
Text

tool name

close x
tool goes here
Tags: news | opinion - editorial | staff editorial

This election season Chapel Hill experimented with public campaign financing for mayor and Town Council races - and the early returns are encouraging. The only two candidates who opted for the public money, and the spending limits that accompanied it, came up winners. One, Penny Rich, finished first among the council contenders. The other, incumbent council member Mark Kleinschmidt, edged out bigger-spending, privately funded Matt Czajkowski in the mayor's race.

Municipal races in Chapel Hill aren't ordinarily a hotbed of big spending or tainted money. Still, Town Council members voted last year to give "clean elections" a try on the municipal level, a first in the state. They reasoned that eliminating the need to raise campaign funds (beyond an initial $750-plus in small contributions) might help candidates focus on the issues and attract outsiders to the race.

The latter didn't happen (and some incumbent council members were reluctant to sign up for funds they'd voted to provide) but the town had a good, vigorous and clean election. Let the experiment proceed.

Get the biggest news in your email or cellphone as it's happening. Sign up for breaking news alerts.

Email Print Order Reprint
Share This
Text

tool name

close x
tool goes here
More Editorials

Get editorial updates

Keep up with the latest opinions from the News & Observer, delivered straight to your inbox, for free!

- it's free!

Hot Deals View All
Find a Car
Go
Top Jobs View All

Find a Job
Go
Featured Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Print Ads

 
We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse, images, internet links or any device to draw undue attention. Read our full comment policy.