Modified Fri, Nov 13, 2009 03:42 PM
Involuntary speech
tool name
close xBob Hall of Democracy North Carolina boldly labels a public financing program for political candidates as honorable and voluntary ("Honorable alternatives for campaign financing," Nov. 5 Point of View article). He is wrong on both counts.
Public financing of political campaigns involves taking taxpayer dollars and making them available to candidates who choose to participate in the program. The voluntary part only applies to the candidates. Taxpayers, however, have no choice. Our tax dollars are directed to candidates we may not otherwise voluntarily support.
I fail to see anything honorable about the use of government force to compel taxpayers to financially support the promotion of ideas they find to be wrong-headed, harmful or even immoral.
Forcing taxpayers to financially support candidates they disagree with is akin to forcing citizens to actually work for the campaign of candidates they oppose.
Hall claims to want to promote ethical politicians, but how can we take that claim seriously when his alternative involves such an unethical use of government coercion over the finances of private citizens?
Brian Balfour
Raleigh
tool name
close xLatest Comment View all comments
Letters Top Stories
-
Developers, too
Regarding your March 15 editorial, I am not certain that listing the loggerhead sea turtle as an endangered species will ensure its survival. -
Puzzling picture
As a Medicare recipient, I am trying to understand why people who appear to be the age also to be Medicare recipients are carrying signs saying "US Government, Keep your hands off my health care." Do all these people waving signs above their gray heads purchase private health insurance? -
Church's obligations
In defense of the Catholic Church's opposition to condom use to reduce the AIDS epidemic in Africa, a March 15 letter-writer claimed that programs "promoting abstinence and chastity appear to be working more effectively [than encouraging condom use]." This claim is completely unsupported by the evidence. -
Overburdened river
Regarding your March 8 Face-off: "Should Raleigh build a whitewater park on the Neuse?" -
Aiming too low
The N&O recently reported that U.S. Rep. Pat McHenry of North Carolina wants to replace Ulysses Grant on the $50 bill with Ronald Reagan. If that is a good idea, why relegate Reagan to $50? -
Academics only
Regarding the March 12 Point of View article "Tearing down policies that built Wake's schools": My experience of 40 years as a university professor, my birthplace Cuba of Armenian parents and my 15-year experience in México City as a professor in a graduate school gives me some insight on education, multicultural awareness, global economy and communication. -
In the schools: the diversity debate
A recent gathering of architects and planners listened as lecturers spoke of sustainable and resilient urban life. The professionals learned that walkable schools are one means of maintaining a healthy urban community. -
Not my spokesman
As a single mother and person of color, I am disgusted with the NAACP and the ignorance displayed during the meeting with the Board of Education. -
Friends the result
Instead of recognizing the cause of the frequent student reassignments - the high growth rate of Wake County - the new school board members insist on chasing a red herring. Diversity is not the problem. -
Starts at home
The next time you are in Raleigh (downtown, mall, park, bar, etc.), look around. Then look at yourself, then look around again. How many around you look like you? How many are different? How many of the different are together? Apart?
Get editorial updates
Keep up with the latest opinions from the News & Observer, delivered straight to your inbox!
Most Popular
Print Ads
 |
@Nyx.CommentBody@