Health/Science

Science & Technology: Read our SciTech series | Contact us | Be a SciTech fan on Facebook | Read our Tech Junkie blog

Published Mon, Jan 18, 2010 05:04 AM
Modified Sun, Jan 17, 2010 07:12 PM

When science and advocacy cross paths

Email Print Order Reprint
Share This
Text

tool name

close x
tool goes here

I always chuckle when scientists are portrayed as cold, calculating, and heartless, when the truth is that they're more committed to understanding their world than anyone else. Science is a labor of passion, and scientists dig deeply into the inner workings of their world.

So when someone says we don't care about something, just because we have a more analytical view of how it works, I get angry.

But, with passion must come temperance.

As scientists we are positioned to understand how the world works, but that is not all of science. Unless your discoveries are communicated to society, they mean nothing. It is up to everyone who does science to make sure they disseminate their knowledge to the rest of the world.

So what happens when your knowledge is loaded with the political baggage that is fundamentally and irreversibly associated with conservation biology (my field)? Do you trust the data of climatologists more if they're active advocates of fighting global warming? On the flip side, do you trust a climatologist who says global warming isn't happening? Can biased observers give unbiased data?

The answer is yes, but with caveats. An ecologist who's ravenously opposed to Alaskan oil drilling is going to be biased in the same way that someone well paid by a pharmaceutical company is biased. They may be totally objective, doing good, robust science, or they may not, but I would approach either data set with the same level of skepticism and caution. And a policymaker, not well versed in scientific literature, would probably be more skeptical (or less if they agree with the researcher) than I.

So there's a delicate line that must be tread.

So how can a scientist be an advocate? He or she can be an advocate of "science." Our duty is to make sure people have access to information, can analyze and interpret it for themselves, and are equipped to make those management decisions. Without the predictive power of unbiased, objective science, we can't anticipate problems and search for solutions until it is too late.

Get the biggest news in your email or cellphone as it's happening. Sign up for breaking news alerts.

Email Print Order Reprint
Share This
Text

tool name

close x
tool goes here
More Health/Science

Get local news updates

Keep up with the latest stories with our free local news e-mail newsletters, delivered straight to your inbox!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

Hot Deals View All
Find a Car
Go
Top Jobs View All

Find a Job
Go
Featured Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

To read more

This blog, southernfriedscience.com, is co-written by Andrew David Thaler, David Shiffman, and Amy Freiteg, all graduate students in science. The Carolinas-based blog focuses on "the ocean, shark conservation, science, conservation, philosophy, education, debate, and controversy."

Print Ads

 
We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse, images, internet links or any device to draw undue attention. Read our full comment policy.