Road Worrier

Cyclists split on two-abreast proposal

Staff WriterMay 11, 2010 

  • Along with a bike safety proposal, the House-Senate Transportation Oversight Committee today will discuss legislation that could be introduced in the 2010 General Assembly, including bills to:

    Strengthen the N.C. Turnpike Authority's power to collect electronic tolls on the Triangle Expressway and other toll roads.

    Remove the $1 fee from the Division of Motor Vehicles for renewing car registrations by mail.

    Add restrictions on towing and storage companies that remove unauthorized cars from private lots. Cars could not be towed more than 15 miles away. Current phone numbers for the towing agencies would have to be posted. Companies could charge only their regular fees for towing and storage. The committee meets at 1 p.m. today in Room 1027 of the Legislative Building in Raleigh.

Bicycle riders are of two minds about state legislation to have them ride no more than two abreast on the highway - and, when car drivers are itching to get past them, to squeeze into single file.

State Rep. Nelson Cole of Reidsville says his proposal is inspired by stories of close calls and screeching brakes. Drivers worry, he says, about the hazards of suddenly meeting cyclists in wide packs on narrow roads.

Cole is co-chairman of a House-Senate committee that will meet today to consider whether to back his proposal and other transportation bills in the 2010 legislative session that starts Wednesday.

Some bike riders - call them doctrinaire cyclistas - will never yield an inch on existing traffic laws that generally give bicycles equal status with cars and trucks.

Of course, bicycles are NOT equal to cars in size, speed, equipment or visibility. And while you don't hear debates about automobiles going side-by-side, there is room for discussion about when and why two-wheelers travel that way.

"As a longtime cyclist, I find riders staying three abreast dangerous and rude," said Steve Holmes, 49, of Wake Forest. While there were a few dissenters among the dozen or so bikers who commented on the legislation, most told the Road Worrier they would not object to a two-abreast limit.

But Holmes and others say cyclists must use their judgment about when to hug the shoulder and when to spread out in pairs - even if it means testing the patience of faster four-wheelers.

Bike safety classes train cyclists essentially to hog the lane in a situation where it would be risky for a motorist to pass, such as on a hill or curve. Limiting this option for cyclists would give motorists the wrong idea, says Anne Bacon of Raleigh.

"Once the state passes a law to require cyclists to move into a single line, the driving public will expect that in every case, and they will expect cyclists to move over right away," said Bacon, 40. "Those expectations are not safe."

Safety in numbers

Several bike riders said they would be more likely to accept restrictions if they were paired with a requirement that cars maintain a three-foot clearance when they zoom past bicycles.

"It is very scary getting buzzed while riding," said cyclist Rich Hunt, 47, of Apex. "Oddly enough, large-group rides rarely get buzzed, but I am buzzed regularly when riding by myself."

A few motorists said the proposed legislation would make it easer to pass cyclists who take up too much of the road. Michael J. MacDonald of Whispering Pines sometimes gets stuck behind cyclists riding three or four abreast - slowly - on rural roads in Moore County.

"I think North Carolina's law equating bicycles with automobiles and trucks is absurd," MacDonald said.

blogs.newsobserver.com/crosstown or 919-829-4527 or bruce.siceloff@newsobserver.com

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service