Agents' Secrets
Published Thu, Oct 21, 2010 06:19 AM
Modified Sun, Mar 27, 2011 04:44 AM

New trial sought in murder case that used SBI blood tests

Email Print Order Reprint
Share This
Text

tool name

close x
tool goes here
- Staff writer

RALEIGH -- George Goode, a man serving two life sentences for a double-murder conviction that initially put him on death row, has asked for a new trial, citing recent revelations about State Bureau of Investigation crime lab problems.

Diane Savage, the lawyer from Chapel Hill representing him, filed a motion in federal court Wednesday seeking relief.

Goode has been in prison for nearly 18 years, convicted of the 1992 killings of Carnell and Margaret Batten, a Johnston County couple who owned a trailer park. Goode has insisted that he was not responsible for the deaths, that he merely witnessed the crime, paralyzed by fear as two others ended the lives of the couple.

At the center of Goode's motion is Duane Deaver, an SBI agent whose work has been under fire in recent months because of his failure to disclose the results of blood tests that could have been favorable to the defense in many criminal cases.

Last year, a federal judge reprimanded Deaver for misleading testimony at Goode's trial because he led a 1993jury to believe that he found blood, when he had only conducted a preliminary test that indicated the possibility of blood.

Though Goode was initially sentenced to death, a federal judge threw out that sentence last year, citing ineffective counsel. In April, Goode was resentenced to two life terms.

In her court filing this week, Savage cited many problems with the SBI crime lab revealed in an audit released in August and an investigative series by The News & Observer.

"The newly discovered evidence is not only new, but shocking, and could not have been anticipated to support any theory or evidence the defense put forth," Savage said in the motion. "The new evidence is material to the case and strikes at the core of the case against Mr. Goode. ... The newly discovered evidence is so damaging to the State, that, had the evidence been developed by skilled counsel, the jury would likely have a reasonable doubt and would have acquitted Mr. Goode."

Get the biggest news in your email or cellphone as it's happening. Sign up for breaking news alerts.

Email Print Order Reprint
Share This
Text

tool name

close x
tool goes here
More Agents' Secrets

Get local news updates

Keep up with the latest stories with our free local news e-mail newsletters, delivered straight to your inbox!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

- it's free!

Hot Deals View All
Find a Car
Go
Top Jobs View All

Find a Job
Go
Featured Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Print Ads

 
We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse, images, internet links or any device to draw undue attention. Read our full comment policy.