Letters

Now on Twitter: Follow the N&O editorial department at @NOopinionshop

Published Wed, Mar 02, 2011 02:00 AM
Modified Tue, Mar 01, 2011 10:30 PM

Liability changes would lower health costs

Email Print Order Reprint
Share This
Text

tool name

close x
tool goes here
Tags: news | opinion - mailbag

Thank you for the Feb. 27 front-page article on much-needed medical liability reform in North Carolina ("Doctors could get more protection from lawsuits").

Defensive medicine is a real, widespread and enormously expensive problem. Nationally, three-fourths of doctors say they order extra medical tests and procedures simply to avoid frivolous lawsuits. Every North Carolinian pays for this excess through higher costs of medical insurance and taxpayer-funded medical programs for the poor.

State and national medical tort reform would help reduce the public's health care costs by billions of dollars while improving patient access to health care, especially in underserved rural areas, according to numerous government authorities and academic scholars who have studied the issue.

Under a bill being considered in the General Assembly, Senate Bill 33, injured patients still would recover every penny of their medical expenses and all losses of future income. And they could get up to half a million more dollars in "noneconomic damages" for subjective, unmeasurable harms such as pain and suffering.

Limiting the amount plaintiffs who sue doctors can win for noneconomic damages is hardly radical. More than half the states have some kind of limit, many at the much lower threshold of $250,000.

The independent, nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office says national tort reform would save American taxpayers $54 billion over the next decade, while boosting government tax revenue by $13 billion.

In December, the bipartisan federal budget deficit commission, co-chaired by North Carolina's Erskine Bowles, strongly endorsed tort reform and urged Congress to consider enacting "an aggressive set of reforms to the tort system" including a nationwide cap on noneconomic damages, which it estimated could save $17 billion by 2020.

In addition, the new federal budget proposed by President Obama, a progressive Democrat lawyer, includes $100 million in federal grants to encourage states to experiment with tort reforms - because the president knows they're needed.

SB 33's details are evolving as it moves through the legislature, as is customary. But enacting strong, sensible tort reform this session is essential to help reduce defensive medicine, lower health care costs, and improve patient access to health care across North Carolina.

Stephen W. Keene

General Counsel, Deputy Executive Vice President

N.C. Medical Society

Raleigh

The length limit was waived.

Get the biggest news in your email or cellphone as it's happening. Sign up for breaking news alerts.

Email Print Order Reprint
Share This
Text

tool name

close x
tool goes here
We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse, images, internet links or any device to draw undue attention. Read our full comment policy.
More Letters

Get editorial updates

Keep up with the latest opinions from the News & Observer, delivered straight to your inbox, for free!

- it's free!

Hot Deals View All
Find a Car
Go
Top Jobs View All

Find a Job
Go
Featured Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Print Ads