New coach, different direction for Canes

Maurice formula just wasn't working out ...

November 29, 2011 

— At this point, the best thing that can be said about the Second Mo Dynasty is that it's over. The Carolina Hurricanes hadn't clicked under Paul Maurice for two full seasons and they were working on a third by the time he was finally fired Monday.

If the Hurricanes had held him responsible for last spring's collapse and hired Kirk Muller this summer, when Muller interviewed for head-coaching openings elsewhere, maybe they wouldn't be in this fix now.

Maurice did an excellent job fine-tuning the team that Peter Laviolette left him in December 2008, and a surprisingly good job of making adjustments on the fly in the 2009 playoffs. But given the chance to retool the team on his terms, it was back to business as usual.

The Hurricanes missed the playoffs in 2010, they missed the playoffs in 2011 and they have very little chance to make the playoffs in 2012. Maurice hasn't taken a team he has coached for a full season to the playoffs since 2002, and that wasn't going to change this year. The Hurricanes went into Monday's games last in the Eastern Conference, six points out of a playoff spot but with seven teams to jump.

Admittedly, the Hurricanes are desperately short of a top-six forward and their biggest free-agent signing, Tomas Kaberle, was a long overdue healthy scratch Sunday night. But this season highlighted all the negatives Maurice has shown as a coach and few of the positives.

Whether intentionally or as an unfortunate consequence of his coaching style, Maurice over the course of his career has stifled his most creative players. The result is all too often a lowest-common-denominator approach that seems designed to create four fourth lines, three third defensive pairings, a goalie who plays 90 percent of the time (or more) and a toothless power play. Meanwhile, underperforming veterans are always given preference over unproven young players.

Over the course of his career, Maurice has been able to squeeze unexpected contributions out of players cast off elsewhere (from Paul Coffey to Jussi Jokinen). But he got very little from Kaberle, Anthony Stewart or Alexei Ponikarovsky while giving top-line minutes to useful role players like Chad LaRose and Jiri Tlusty who played hard but didn't produce.

It hasn't worked in Carolina since 2002, it didn't work in Toronto and it didn't work when given a second chance here - a chance he never would have gotten anywhere else, and only got because of his friendship with owner Peter Karmanos and general manager Jim Rutherford.

How many millions has that friendship cost the franchise now?

Muller faces a difficult task this season. Just to get to 92 points and give themselves a chance to make the playoffs, the Hurricanes will have to go roughly 32-17-8 the rest of the way. According to the website sportsclubstats.com, there's a 2.1 percent chance of that.

Which raises the question: With this team struggling mightily for a month, what took so long to make this change? (Meanwhile, fan interest turned to apathy, tickets went unsold, season tickets went unused, and the foundation built in 2002, 2006 and 2009 was chipped away, little by little, with each disheartening loss.) Only Karmanos and Rutherford know the answer.

Let's just hope whenever Muller's reign comes to an end, whether that's sooner or later, they don't give in to the compulsion to reboot Mo 3.0. They can't afford it. Neither can this franchise.

luke.decock@newsobserver.com, twitter.com/LukeDeCock or (919) 829-8947

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service