Q. I own a small property and casualty insurance agency, and have always contributed to, and encouraged my two employees to contribute to, either a tax-deductible IRA or a Roth IRA. I've just started making a decent amount of money and want to put away more for my own retirement. Someone suggested a defined benefit plan, but that seems like something I may want to consider in the future when I am sure about my income stream and when I have employees that are much younger than I. Do you agree? I am 40, making $275,000 a year, and my employees are 33, making $35,000, and 35, $95,000. I also don't want to spend a fortune on a third-party administrator, so I'm leaning toward a 401(k), SEP IRA or a SIMPLE IRA. Which would you recommend?
I agree with waiting on the defined benefit plan. It is quite a commitment, and works in favor of business owners who are older than their employees and make a higher wage. The administrative costs and the required funding of the plan probably outweigh the benefits at this time.
Unless you have expertise in this area, you would also want to hire a third-party administrator for a traditional 401(k) plan. It will be subject to top-heavy rules which ensure that employer contributions do not discriminate in favor of highly compensated or key employees, which would include you. You could adopt a safe-harbor 401(k) plan, but this requires you to make some contributions that are immediately vested, meaning employees are entitled to the money you contribute even if they leave in a short period of time. Non-safe-harbor contributions can have a vesting schedule. Even with a safe-harbor plan, it would still be prudent to hire a third-party administrator. The maximum employee contribution to a 401(k) for 2012 is $17,000 (plus $5,500 if 50 or over), and the total, including the employer match, is $50,000. This would be a nice savings vehicle for you, but costly if your employees decide to make substantial contributions because you have to offer the same match to all eligible employees.




