Now on Twitter: Follow the N&O editorial department at @NOopinionshop

Published Thu, Jan 26, 2012 02:00 AM
Modified Wed, Jan 25, 2012 06:04 PM

Dividing lines

Article

0 COMMENTS

Email Print Order Reprint

More Letters

Frances T. Armstrong: Wind and wings
Regarding the May 23 article "Wind farm could harm the state's bald eagle population": Ten active American Bald Eagle nests within the vicinity of the proposed Pantego wind farm is not a "fluke." Invenergy must apply for an eagle take (kill) permit; otherwise, the take will be unlawful and intentional.
Joseph J. Wheeler: 6th Fleet actions
I was the commanding officer of the Marine Detachment aboard the USS Little Rock (CLG 4) flagship of the U.S. 6th Fleet at the time of the attack on the USS Liberty (AGTR-5) by Israeli air and naval forces.
Charlie Gravel: Play on
Huge thanks to The N&O for publicizing the International Bluegrass Music Association's decision to hold its annual convention in Raleigh for the next three years.
David Cunningham: Conscience and Christ
Regarding Lenore Yarger’s May 21 Point of View article about Catholic social justice, it is obvious that Yarger hasn’t yet found a better church at which to worship or it would have happened by now.
Stu Guthrie: That Catholic cult
Columnist Rick Martinez voted for Amendment One because his bishop told him to. He should be reminded that in the not too distant past, the same arguments he uses against gays were used by God-fearing ministers against Catholics: that the Bible is clear in its teaching against them; that the pope and his bishops are agents of the devil; that they want only to brainwash vulnerable children; and that Protestants should never marry one.
Phil Seymour: Where church leads
Rick Martinez is a walking contradiction. On the one hand he laments the most “egregious and baseless complaint” that “[his] vote [for the Marriage Amendment] was an imposition of religious values on others,” and on the other admits that “[He] voted for the Marriage Amendment because [his Catholic] bishop urged [him] to do so.”
Charles Lorelli: Catholic Charities’ effective outreach
I read with interest the May 21 Point of View piece by Lenore Yarger and can assure you and your readers that the current issues cited in the piece (relating to the marriage amendment, government-mandated free contraception, the Cathedral Campaign, etc.) are not reducing the efforts on behalf of the poor and marginalized at Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Raleigh, nor is any money being diverted from Catholic Charities as a result of these issues.
Steven DelGrosso: Informing a vote
Whether or not you supported the Marriage Amendment, Rick Martinez has eloquently expressed and logically explained the proper consideration and perspective of theology framing an individual's participation in American politics (column, May 23). Martinez drew on an American historical perspective (his reference to Dr. King), his personal religious experience, and yes his personal view of theology, to shape his decision-making process. In this case, Martinez cast an informed vote and one that upheld his personal beliefs. I suspect election outcomes would better reflect the will of the people if each one of us would do the same.
Robert Deucher: Destructive commentary
I earnestly read the Point of View article by Lenore Yarger on May 21, only to be sadly disappointed in your headline, “A Catholic tradition of social justice.” Rather than an articulate review of the works of St. Augustine through the modern teachings of Blessed John Paul II, an undisciplined barrage of anger once again opened more wounds in the body of Christ.
Carol and Jim McBride: Honest view
Lenore Yarger’s May 21 Point of View article, “A Catholic tradition of social justice,” expressed what so many of us completely agree with. The fact that she had the courage to write so honestly about the subject has given us, and hopefully others, the strength to speak out.