Letters

Now on Twitter: Follow the N&O editorial department at @NOopinionshop

Published Wed, Feb 15, 2012 02:00 AM
Modified Wed, Feb 15, 2012 04:49 AM

Following funds

Email Print Order Reprint
Share This
Text

tool name

close x
tool goes here
Tags: news | opinion - mailbag

Rick Martinez, in his Feb. 8 column, asked about the requirement that public institutions include contraception coverage in employee insurance plans, to wit: "How can a Catholic institution teach that a practice is immoral while at the same time subsidize its use?"

There is a good answer: How can a religion-affiliated public institution that takes federal funds impose its religious beliefs on its employees? President Obama's directive didn't affect purely religious entities like churches, only church-linked hospitals and the like that take taxpayer money, and that both employ and serve people of all faiths.

It is precisely the taking of government money that exposes Catholic institutions to the same rules as other providers of similar services to the community. Catholic hospitals and universities have two choices: either stop taking government money, or respect the reproductive rights of female employees regardless of doctrine.

Rob Sharer

Raleigh

Get the biggest news in your email or cellphone as it's happening. Sign up for breaking news alerts.

Email Print Order Reprint
Share This
Text

tool name

close x
tool goes here
We welcome your comments on this story, but please be civil. Do not use profanity, hate speech, threats, personal abuse, images, internet links or any device to draw undue attention. Read our full comment policy.
More Letters

Get editorial updates

Keep up with the latest opinions from the News & Observer, delivered straight to your inbox, for free!

- it's free!

Hot Deals View All
Find a Car
Go
Top Jobs View All

Find a Job
Go
Featured Homes View All
Find a Home
Go

Print Ads