Editorial

Campaign matchmaker

June 23, 2012 

The financing of political campaigns with taxpayer money is a concept that grew out of Watergate-era fundraising scandals. It acknowledges the public interest in ensuring that candidates have the wherewithal to campaign while making them less dependent on money raised from private sources – often people angling for special treatment. And it has helped keep extremely wealthy donors from, in effect, buying the outcome they wanted.

On the presidential level, however, the public financing system has become obsolete. Not enough money is provided. And no-holds-barred super PACs now invite all comers to give whatever they feel like giving to help their favorite candidate.

Democratic U.S. Rep. David Price of Chapel Hill is sponsoring a bill to make public financing of presidential races viable again. A key provision would create a four-to-one public match for private contributions up to $200, so a candidate would actually get $1,000 from a $200 gift.

So long as super PACs are riding high and candidates such as President Obama and Mitt Romney are enjoying their support, Price’s bill faces a tough go. But he has the right idea, highlighting the need to keep the financing of presidential campaigns in the open and under control.

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service