Progress Energy Historical time line
1908: Carolina Power & Light formed in merger of three companies, Raleigh Electric, Central Carolina Power and Consumer Light & Power
1926: CP&L merges with Pigeon River Power Co., Asheville Power, Carolina Power Co. and Yadkin River Power of South Carolina, becoming one of the largest electric utility companies in the country
1946: CP&L stock begins trading on the New York Stock Exchange
1952: CP&L merges with Tide Water Power to expand into southeastern part of state, representing the company’s last major expansion for the rest of the century
2000: CP&L merges with Florida Progress to expand into Florida, doubling the company’s size and resulting in name-change to Progress Energy
2011
Jan. 10: Progress Energy and Duke Energy propose a corporate merger that would form the nation’s biggest electric utility
Sept. 2: Progress and Duke guarantee $650 million in savings over five years for customers in the Carolinas
Sept. 20: Three days of merger hearings get under way before the N.C. Utilities Commission
Sept. 30: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rejects the merger, saying it would “have an adverse effect on competition”
Oct. 8: The utilities propose merger revisions
Nov. 17: The merging utilities say they will cut 1,860 positions over three years
Dec. 14: Federal regulators reject the merger a second time, saying that proposed revisions were inadequate
2012
Feb. 22: Progress and Duke file merger revisions that include transmission upgrades plus wholesale power sales
May 8: In a compromise with N.C. consumer advocate, Progress and Duke agree to delay or absorb about $450 million in additional merger-related costs
June 8: Federal regulators approve merger with more than a dozen conditions
June 25: Second hearing held in Raleigh before the N.C. Utilities Commission, this one lasting less than an hour
Friday: N.C. Utilities Commission approves the merger.
Sources: N&O, Progress Energy, "A Century of Progress: Celebrating Progress Energy’s History of Service" by Chris Roush


Judge raises more questions about WakeMed Medicare settlement

