Jane E. Brown: Life-saving test

November 29, 2012 

Life-saving test

Regarding the Nov. 22 article “Study links mammograms to unnecessary treatment”: Another study that will lead some women to believe it is not necessary for them to get a yearly mammogram. I believe there was a similar study about five years ago.

I had my yearly mammogram in 2006. It showed a new mass that was suspicious. My biopsy was positive for invasive ductal carcinoma. It was a more aggressive type of breast cancer – triple negative. I had a lumpectomy, chemotherapy and radiation therapy.

I am now a six-year survivor. If I reach the seven-year mark, I am told that my chances of recurrence, metastasis will decrease significantly.

I had no family history of any cancer; there were no palpable masses.

I work in the cancer field and see the majority of invasive breast cancers detected by mammography. Should I have been one of those women who might have heeded the implied advice of this study and skipped my mammogram that year? No, I think not!

Jane E. Brown


News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service