Goodwin the best insurance for NC drivers

March 8, 2013 

When Wayne Goodwin warns that legislators and some in the insurance industry may be up to something, it’s fairly safe to assume that...they may be up to something.

So let’s hope all these pro-business Republicans in the General Assembly understand that if they should act in a way that has North Carolina consumers paying more for auto insurance, and facing more rate increases in a revised system with few checks and balances, the voters may decide to be not so pro-Republican in the next election.

Once again, Republicans are raising suggestions for changes in auto insurance regulation that would take authority away from Goodwin in the name of simplifying regulation. In this case, it appears simplification could come at quite a price.

North Carolina has a good system of rate regulation, wherein companies submit their rate requests to the N.C. Rate Bureau, which oversees rate-making on other insurance-related topics, and then requests are reviewed by the commissioner.

But Republicans seem inclined to reduce the commissioner’s authority. Goodwin says he sees in the bill a chance for companies to push through substantial rate increases without facing his authority.

Here’s an example of what appears to be a little rhetorical trickery. Bill advocates say the commissioner would have final authority over rates, and could reject proposed increases he believed to be wrong. Goodwin, however, says the wording of the bill indicates companies could push rate increases of up to 12 percent automatically. And, Goodwin says, the bill said rates of less than an aggregated 12 percent “shall be presumed not to be excessive, inadequate or unfairly discriminatory.”

In other words, it seems, if any increase is less than 12 percent it’s considered perfectly acceptable, commissioner or no commissioner.

This seems to be another case of consumers needing to beware “reform” that is suspiciously one-sided in favor of an industry or more important, unnecessary.

One of the arguments made for the bill, for example, is that with a “simpler” regulatory system (look out, consumers), North Carolinians would benefit from more competition for their business.

Well, Goodwin responds by noting that some 160 auto insurers compete now for business in North Carolina. So it appears that part of regulation isn’t broken. Goodwin also notes the state’s rates are low, regionally and nationally. Hmmmm...something else that indicates oversight as it stands now isn’t broken.

So this measure falls apart not just on suspicion, but on merit, or the lack thereof.

Why change it, then? When something like this is on the horizon, it’s always likely that politics or special interests’ influence, or both, are part of the inspiration. One wonders if this just might be an effort to punish an insurance commissioner elected statewide by the people because he happens to be a Democrat.

Goodwin has learned to watch his back on matters such as this. In this case, he’s watching the backs of all North Carolina consumers.

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service