Point of View

Canadian oil, the Keystone pipeline and the Chinese

March 10, 2013 

Oil Pipeline Protest

Actress Daryl Hannah, center, joined environmental leaders who tied themselves to the White House gate to protest the Keystone XL oil pipeline. She was later arrested.

ANN HEISENFELT — AP

A Chinese oil company this month bought a small but significant player in the Canadian oil sands, the third-largest deposit of accessible oil in the world and the source of more than a quarter of U.S. oil imports. The sale of Nexen Inc. to the Chinese National Offshore Oil Company for $15.1 billion was the largest Chinese overseas acquisition ever and continues a patient, strategic Chinese campaign to secure energy assets in North America.

Also this month, the U.S. State Department issued its latest environmental report card on the long-delayed Keystone XL pipeline, which would bring more of that oil-sands crude from Canada to Nebraska and on to the U.S. Gulf Coast.

Americans have a love-hate relationship with Canadian oil, as thousands of anti-Keystone demonstrators in Washington recently reaffirmed. The Chinese are clearly not so conflicted.

What these events made obvious is that if people think Canadian oil will stay in the ground if we just don’t build Keystone XL, they are wrong.

National oil companies like CNOOC, which is 70 percent owned by the People’s Republic of China, already control more than 80 percent of the world’s oil reserves. Of the 20 percent that remain open to market-based development, 60 percent are in Canada, almost all in the oil sands region of Alberta.

That fact has not escaped the attention of China, whose rapid growth has been fueled by quantum leaps in oil consumption.

Until 1993, China was self-sufficient in oil. Today it has to import almost 60 percent of the oil it consumes, and it is the world’s second-largest oil user after the United States. By 2035, the U.S. Energy Information Administration expects China to import 75 percent of its oil needs.

This voracious thirst for petroleum has driven the Chinese to sign long-term oil contracts with countries such as Venezuela, another traditional U.S. oil supplier, and aggressively explore opportunities in energy-rich and investment-friendly Canada.

As one Canadian energy executive who has worked closely with Chinese oil companies explained, China has piles of cash locked in U.S. treasury notes that it regards as declining assets. Investing this cash in energy resources abroad is a no-brainer, both for their intrinsic value and for the technological expertise Chinese companies can gain.

In fact, said this executive, the only question Chinese companies have asked him was how many Canadian assets they could buy before eliciting a negative reaction, as CNOOC did in the United States in 2005 when it tried unsuccessfully to acquire the U.S. energy company Unocal for $18.5 billion.

Since then, Chinese companies have avoided scrutiny by purchasing only minority interests in Canadian energy companies – PetroChina, for example, bought a partial stake in the Athabasca Oil Sands Co. in 2010 – or buying only the smallest operators.

The Nexen deal represents a shift in that strategy.

Nexen is the biggest Canadian energy company to fall entirely under Chinese ownership. While it is not the largest player in the oil sands, its takeover means Chinese national oil companies now own about 10 percent of Canadian oil-sands operations.

And few expect their buying spree to stop there.

Meanwhile, the 875-mile Keystone XL pipeline that would bring that same Canadian oil to the United States remains under review in the U.S. State Department, which must grant it a Presidential Permit because it crosses an international border.

Shortly after the Nexen takeover was announced, the State Department released its latest environmental report card on a re-routed Keystone XL. The 2,000-page report concluded “there would be no significant impacts to most resources along the proposed Project route.”

The report did note that producing oil-sands product releases from 5 percent to 19 percent more greenhouse gases than production of an average conventional barrel of oil in the United States.

These higher emissions have led opponents to argue against the pipeline on the grounds that if the U.S. didn’t buy so much oil-sands oil, less would eventually be produced, releasing fewer greenhouse gases.

Judging from CNOOC’s massive investment, these concerns aren’t keeping the Chinese up at night. If people here seriously think blocking Keystone XL will stop oil sands production, perhaps they should get more sleep.

Stephen R. Kelly is the associate director of Canadian Studies at Duke University and a former U.S. diplomat in Canada.

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service