States crack down on top earners who flee as taxes rise

Bloomberg NewsMarch 19, 2013 

  • Tax changes ahead in N.C.

    In North Carolina, lawmakers are looking to revamp the state’s tax system. No bills have been filed but GOP legislators earlier this year were looking to eliminate personal and corporate income taxes while increasing the state sales tax on groceries, medical expenses and many services that are now tax free.

    Staff reports

— With professional golfers and hedge fund managers talking about moving to lower-tax enclaves, states are stepping up audits on top earners who flee.

Several states, including California and Maryland, raised taxes on high earners last year, and Congress boosted federal levies on them. Families who look to change their domicile to a state with no income taxes such as Florida or Nevada open themselves up to years of scrutiny and possible litigation as local governments search for revenue.

“I look at some of these domicile audits almost as an archeological dig and a full physical including MRIs and CAT scans,” said David Scott Sloan, a partner who advises high net worth families at Boston-based Holland & Knight.

States are using automated programs to track down residents who say they have moved and may be keeping two residences, and officials are seeking to tax earnings on stock awards beyond their borders. In Minnesota, Gov. Mark Dayton proposed a so-called snowbird tax that would lower the number of days a person spends in the state before having to file a return.

Some families are considering moving from high-tax states such as California and New York to a lower – or-no tax – state because tax rates are climbing, said Jim Steiner, president of Abbot Downing, a unit of Wells Fargo whose new clients generally have at least $50 million in investable assets.

Congress raised the top rate this year to 39.6 percent from 35 percent for taxable income above $400,000 for singles and $450,000 for married couples. Those same top earners saw the rates on long-term capital gains and dividends jump to as much as 23.8 percent from 15 percent.

Golf champion Phil Mickelson drew attention in January after saying he would make some “drastic changes” because of higher taxes. Voters in California, where he lives, approved an increase in the top state income tax rate to 13.3 percent from 10.3 percent.

Top earners who change domicile have to prove they have changed their life if they are audited by their former state.

The audit and appeal process can take years, said Phil Olsen, a partner at Burns & Levinson in Boston who litigates state and local tax cases. Olsen has 14 such cases pending now, nine of which are in litigation and five in the audit process. Families often reach a settlement and pay some taxes before agreeing to a date when they are no longer considered a resident, he said.

“It feels to clients like states are making you pay an exit tax,” similar to how the U.S. government assesses those above a certain income level who give up their citizenship, only at the state level it’s not statutory, said Sloan, chairman of the private wealth group at Holland & Knight.

Taxpayers filing a part-year-resident tax return or one that indicates they are no longer residents can trigger an audit, Sloan said.

“That typically puts the first red flag up,” he said.

A new trend is the attempt by states to capture more revenue from equity awards even of people who have moved out, said Cara Griffith, legal editor of Tax Analysts’ weekly publication dedicated to state and local taxation.

Federal law prohibits states from taxing certain retirement income of non-residents such as distributions from 401(k) and individual retirement accounts. Other equity-based compensation including restricted stock units or stock options don’t have those limitations, said Griffith.

“States are starting to look at how they can tax that money,” if it was earned while people were working within their borders, she said. “States are getting aggressive across the board. Anywhere they think they can get money they’re going to grab it.”

Revenue departments in states also have gotten better at using technology to tap information in Internal Revenue Service databases, as well as credit reports and E-Z Pass records, to track down former residents, Griffith said.

In Minnesota, Dayton proposed a snowbird tax to require those in the state more than 60 days to file a return, rather than the original 182 days.

“He feels that if individuals live in the state for part of the year, they should help pay for the services that they enjoy,” spokeswoman Katharine Tinucci said in an e-mail.

Sloan gives high net worth clients who move a checklist of actions such as obtaining a new driver’s license, cancelling memberships to local organizations in their former state and transferring investments so they are based in the new locale.

“You have to change your life,” Sloan said. “You can’t just say I’m spending 183 days here and not 183 days there.”

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service