Analysis: Tax plan creates more losers than winners

jfrank@newsobserver.comMay 9, 2013 

  • A look at how some would fare under proposed tax overhaul

    Senate leaders say the tax overhaul is necessary to create a more stable and fair system and they encouraged taxpayers to test drive the plan by using an online calculator to personalize the results.

    Over two days, The N&O took the calculator into the community, from Chapel Hill to Smithfield, to let software engineers, retirees, stay-at-home mothers and others see how it would affect them. In more than two dozen conversations, most people expressed reservations about the plan and lawmakers’ intentions, regardless of whether they would save money.

    It illustrates the hurdle state lawmakers face in the final days of the legislative session as they consider sweeping changes.

    Here are a few who talked about how the changes could affect them.

    Marie Carcione, 40

    Carcione is a public works staffer for Johnston County, so she knows the importance of tax dollars. But she and her husband are working and raising three children in Selma. They keep tight reins on the family budget. “I understand the need for some, but I think we are overtaxed,” she said.

    She is particularly concerned about imposing a combined 6.5 percent sales tax on food. “I think that’s ridiculous,” she said. “My God, we are taxed on our cars, our homes, our pets, on everything.”

    How she may fare? Pays $400 more over three years.

    Ronnie Barbour, 63

    Along with his wife, Gail, Barbour is retired and living on a fixed income outside Clayton. “It means you have to watch where every penny goes and hope nobody doesn’t get drastically sick,” he said. He wants to see taxes cut, but he is cynical about any talk from lawmakers. And consumption taxes would hit them hard. “It doesn’t make any difference what the public wants, the politicians are going to do what they want,” he said. “It’s just tax, tax, tax, tax.”

    How he may fare? Pays about $600 more over three years.

    Eric Knisley, 51

    As a state employee with no wife or children at home in Carrboro, Knisley said he lives frugally. “I live a fairly cheap life,” he said. The savings “basically pays all my bills for a month and a half.”

    But when he looks at the broad picture, he questions the wisdom of a tax swap. “Raising the sales tax affects everybody across the board, including poor people,” he said. “So I can see how that funnels more income to people like me.”

    How he may fare? Saves $1,300 over three years.

    Chris Dial, 49

    A business analyst at a pharmaceutical research company, Dial isn’t surprised that he would save money if income taxes are cut. He makes good money. “Really it’s how guys like me, white males in the (higher) tax brackets, can reduce their tax burden,” he said. He doesn’t put a tax overhaul on his list of priorities for lawmakers in Raleigh. And he doesn’t believe the plan would generate broader economic growth and trickle down.

    How he may fare? Saves about $4,200 over three years.

    Staff writer John Frank

The promise of a massive tax cut from Raleigh is meeting skepticism outside the capital as a nuanced picture of the winners and losers begins to emerge.

Take Tom Daughtry, a 72-year-old from Smithfield. He is likely to save money under a Senate plan that slashes income taxes in exchange for a broader sales tax that applies to food, prescription drugs and 130 services that are currently exempt.

But he isn’t convinced by the math. “I’m for just leaving the taxes like it is,” Daughtry said as he fingered two fishing lures in the sporting goods section at Walmart on Wednesday. “Even if you lower the income taxes, you are just going to pay more when you are out shopping. It doesn’t make a difference.”

The majority of taxpayers likely would see a tax increase after the plan is fully implemented, according to early long-term projections from legislative fiscal researchers who analyzed the potential legislation – not a tax break as Senate Republican leaders suggested when announcing the plan this week.

A taxpayer with a federal adjusted gross income below $51,000 could pay an average $100 to $200 more in the 2017 tax year. Based on current tax brackets, 2.3 million taxpayers would fit that category, according to the analysis, while 1.8 million taxpayers could expect an average $300 to $3,000 tax cut that year.

In announcing the plan Tuesday, Senate leader Phil Berger, an Eden Republican, emphasized that the legislation was not yet finalized, but said the “vast majority,” or roughly two-thirds of taxpayers, would initially get a tax cut as a result of the legislation.

The draft fiscal analysis, obtained by The News & Observer, is still a working document, said Barry Boardman, the legislature’s economist. “The details pertaining to 2017 have not been worked out at this stage,” said Amy Auth, a Berger spokeswoman.

Analysis: Savings won’t last

For the first three years, most North Carolinians would pay less, the analysis shows. But it won’t last.

The plan includes a temporary “working families” tax break for middle-income households that will sunset in 2016. A calculator Senate leaders created to allow taxpayers to estimate their tax savings ends in year 2016 and doesn’t take into account what could amount to a tax increase for families making $30,000 to $75,000 the next year.

Even in the first years, the tax plan produces mixed results.

The Senate’s projections show lower-income families and those with three or more children likely would get a tax increase, while taxpayers making more than the state’s $46,000 median household income, particularly those without children, would save money.

“The plan is not family friendly,” said Sabra Faires, an attorney at Bailey & Dixon in Raleigh and the former assistant secretary for tax administration at the state Department of Revenue. “You pay more tax for every child you have. ... This plan favors people with no children as opposed to families.”

At a Target in Durham, Lisa Leary, a 40-year-old mother of four children, said when she heard about the plan she wanted to support it. But the calculator suggests that she could pay more in taxes. Instead, she wants state leaders to focus on cutting spending.

“I just think we are so taxed to death,” she said Thursday. “I just think some people are so dependent on the government that we have to tax people more.”

The Senate proposal lowers the personal income tax rate to a flat 4.5 percent, from a top bracket of 7.75 percent. It also cuts the corporate tax rate to 6 percent from 6.9 percent and adjusts how it is calculated.

To raise new money to offset the cuts, the plan applies a 6.5 percent combined state and local sales tax to prescription drugs and more than 130 services that are currently tax-free, such as haircuts, lawn services, car repairs and professional help such as attorneys, accountants and doctors.

In addition, the sales tax on food, currently a 2 percent local tax, is raised to the combined sales tax of 6.5 percent. The current state sales tax is 4.75 percent; most counties charge an additional 2 percent.

The tax shift toward consumption is what hurts lower-income people and large families. “That’s pretty significant,” said Rollin Groseclose, an Asheville certified public accountant. “That is one of the concerns, that the wealthier may be coming out a little better off.”

‘It’s a trial balloon’

Sen. Bob Rucho, a Charlotte Republican helping to lead the effort, cautioned against reaching final conclusions before the bill is finished. “It’s a trial balloon,” he said of the tax plan. “This is just the starting point.”

But to see all the benefits, Rucho said taxpayers need to look at the bigger picture. He believes the Senate plan will boost the state’s economy and create higher-paying jobs for low-income earners. “The fact is everyone will be better off because the economy will be expanding and they will have an opportunity for more jobs and better jobs,” he said.

To help low-income earners, the Senate plan in the first year exempts those who make less than $10,000 from paying any income tax. It gradually increases the threshold to $15,000 in 2017.

Mark Shanahan, a 46-year-old software engineer with a wife and three kids at home in Raleigh, could save good money under the plan.

As he ate lunch in Cary on Thursday, Shanahan said he supports the general concept but worried about what it means for folks who makes less than him.

“I don’t like the idea of taxing basic food or prescription drugs,” he said. “There are certain things that are like minimal staples.”

Frank: 919-829-4698

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service