Accessories no longer tethered to Apple

Royalties to tech giant potentially at risk, but customers may benefit

New York TimesMay 12, 2013 

MOBILE ACCESSORIES 1

Rory Dooley, senior vice president for music at Logitech, with three of the company's Apple-compatible devices in Newark, Calif., May 3, 2013. Manufacturers are gravitating toward wireless connections for Apple's products, which is helping the market for competitors' mobile devices.

PETER DASILVA — NYT

For years, Apple’s clout in the electronics world could be gauged by how easy it was to bump into devices tailor-made for a connection to an iPhone or iPod.

Hotels outfitted guest rooms with alarm clocks containing a telltale wedge of 30 tiny pins that could play music from Apple’s devices and charge their batteries. Retail stores were thick with sound docks and other speaker systems meant to work with Apple gadgets.

But Apple’s iron grip on the digital accessories in hotel rooms, store shelves and living rooms is starting to slip – potentially risking the royalties it earns from accessory makers and, more significant, giving Apple customers more freedom to switch to rival products. That could be an issue for a company whose stock has been shaken in recent months as investors worry that the iPhone business is slowing.

Jeremy Horwitz, editor in chief of iLounge, a website devoted to Apple accessories, said Apple’s aggressive control over accessories for its products drove many makers to more open means of connecting devices, which helped feed the success of mobile devices made by other companies.

“At some point Apple’s obsession with having control over everything that is associated with its products may wind up biting it,” Horwitz said.

The Bluetooth standard for wireless connections has allowed accessory makers to build products that can work with many kinds of devices because they no longer have to worry about a physical hook. Other phone makers such as Samsung and tablet device makers such as Amazon have become strong alternatives in the eyes of gadget shoppers. And Apple itself provided an opening for competitors when it changed the way its phones connect to other devices, aggravating both its business partners and consumers.

Now accessory makers are eager, even obliged, to think beyond Apple.

“We’ve had to adapt to new technology, support more devices and meet the growing demands of consumers looking for accessories that can accommodate multiple devices,” said Ezra S. Ashkenazi, chief executive of iHome, one of the biggest makers of iPhone clock radios and other Apple audio accessories. This year, iHome is releasing more products with Bluetooth than ever before, he said.

Apple says it is fine with the wireless direction in which accessories are headed.

“Apple provides users with the best wired and wireless connectivity options to work with the broadest range of accessories,” said Tom Neumayr, a spokesman for Apple. “As a result, iOS users have access to the world’s largest ecosystem of options and the most seamless integration with our products.”

Apple expected some grumbling from customers and partners last fall when it introduced in the iPhone 5 a new way for the mobile phone to connect to other devices. But its executives defended the connector, Lightning, because the new, smaller design allowed for slimmer phones and tablets. While the 30-pin connector can be plugged into an old iPhone in only one way, a Lightning cable works even if it is flipped over.That change frustrated partners whose customers had invested in products that used Apple’s old 30-pin connector. Those older devices are incompatible with the latest Apple products without an adapter that Apple sells for $29. Also, the new Lightning connectors are more expensive to license and manufacture than the old ones, electronics makers say.

“A lot of us were bitten pretty badly by the connector transition,” said Ian Geise, senior vice president for marketing and product development at Voxx Accessories Corp., which makes audio products under RCA, Acoustic Research and other brand names.

Voxx has stopped making audio products with proprietary Apple connectors in them, though it is making a multiroom speaker system that uses AirPlay, Apple’s own technology for wirelessly connecting devices, Geise said.

Logitech, which used to offer an array of speaker docks with the old 30-pin link, has also stopped using Apple connectors and, like many accessory makers, is creating speaker systems that connect to mobile devices over Bluetooth, the short-range wireless technology that is in practically every new mobile phone, tablet and car stereo.

Lightning accelerated change

The prevalence of the old Apple connector in accessories was partly a reflection of Apple’s dominance in the MP3 player market with the iPod, a business that is fading as smartphones become more important sources of music.

“Even before Apple shifted from the 30-pin connector to Lightning, the market had started shifting,” said Rory Dooley, senior vice president for music at Logitech. “Lightning came in and accelerated some of the change. People wanted to get away from these proprietary connectors.” Apple earns money from accessory makers who must pay royalties, an amount Apple does not disclose, to license Apple’s proprietary connectors for their products through a program Apple calls MFi (as in, Made for iPhone).

Still, it is not clear how much Apple will suffer from accessory makers shunning its connector. Apple’s entire family of iOS devices support Bluetooth, too, so they are just as compatible with wireless speaker systems.

There is no question consumers are moving toward wireless connections. Last year, American sales of digital speakers with physical docks fell 16 percent to $505 million, while wireless streaming speakers, most of which used Bluetooth, jumped 175 percent to $383 million, according to NPD Group, a research firm that tracks retail sales.

Competitors gaining ground

Fewer people who buy sound systems that work only with Apple devices, in theory, could mean fewer obstacles for those interested in switching to competing phones and tablets in the future. And those competitors are gaining ground.

In recent years, Samsung, for example, has gone from a bit player in the mobile phone business to the top dog. Its share of global smartphone shipments in the first quarter grew to 32.7 percent from 28.8 percent a year earlier, while Apple’s fell to 17.3 percent from 23 percent, according to IDC, a market and technology research firm.

Apple, sensing that wireless would replace the physical cables tethering its devices to others, introduced AirPlay several years ago. The technology, which works over Wi-Fi home networks, appears to have gotten the most traction among people who use it to stream music and video into living rooms through Apple TV, a device made by the company that connects to home theater systems.

AirPlay is more common in high-end audio systems, partly because adding the technology contributes significant costs to a product – at least $30 per speaker system or receiver sold, according to one manufacturer.

Among the broader electronics industry though, AirPlay has not taken off. “There’s very little support for AirPlay right now,” said Stephen Baker, an analyst at NPD. “It’s expensive. Bluetooth is very cost-effective.”

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service