About 180 bills advance in NC House, Senate

jfrank@newsobserver.comMay 17, 2013 

  • How to game crossover: A primer

    There are many ways to bring a supposedly “dead bill” back to life. Let us count a few.

    1. Strip a bill.

    This is a classic move. Legislators take all the language out of a bill that has passed the crossover deadline and fill it with a different proposal.

    2. Add a fee.

    Take a piece of legislation and find a way to attach a fee. Bills that have anything to do with money don’t have to meet the deadline.

    3. Put it in the budget.

    The budget is often filled with laws that don’t get the usual committee treatment. They’re called special provisions.

    4. Put it in the technical corrections bill.

    This bill passes near the end of the session – sometimes on the last day – and can be stuffed with new laws.

    Staff writer Lynn Bonner

  • By the numbers

    133 Number of bills that passed the House this week

    55 Number of bills that passed the Senate this week

— Scrambling to hurdle a key deadline, state lawmakers approved roughly 180 bills this week, spending seconds on some and hours on others, often in marathon sessions that left them confused and bleary-eyed.

The House gave final approval Thursday to measures that rejected the use of Islamic Sharia law in North Carolina and prohibited coverage for abortions in the new state health insurance exchange, both marked by a heated debate. The Senate, by contrast, spent 14 minutes in session, declining to consider legislation to repeal local bans on smoking in public parks and beaches and study the expansion of midwifery that leaves the measures essentially dead.

But the chaos of the so-called crossover week – in which most legislation must pass one chamber to remain alive for the two-year session – became eclipsed later in the day as attention turned to the two most significant debates still looming over the final weeks of lawmaking.

The Senate announced it would release its state budget plan online Sunday with formal committee meetings and full votes expected next week. Senate leader Phil Berger said the plan would spend about $20.4 billion, less than Gov. Pat McCrory’s $20.6 billion proposal.

The budget is expected to reflect the Senate’s desire to cut annual spending as part of a tax overhaul, even though the House revealed its own tax plan Thursday that is much more modest in scope than what the Senate has outlined.

The major issues outstanding are likely to make the final push reflect the intensity from earlier this week. The self-imposed crossover deadline created a burst of activity that stuffed legislative meeting rooms and filled hallways with lobbyists, activists and others eager to get a bill to the floor or keep it buried in committee.

A House bill to prevent employers or colleges from tapping into the private social media accounts of its applicants passed 111-1 at 10:09 p.m. Wednesday, with just four minutes of debate from weary lawmakers. But in the daylight the next morning, it consumed a half-hour and led to a split 76-36 vote. And later, a parliamentary move ground all action to an extended halt before being resolved.

Earlier in the week, most Democrats preliminarily voted for a bill to curtail civil service protections for state employees, even though they opposed the bill and fought it a day later on final reading. “We were so damn tired no one realized it,” said Democratic Rep. Paul Luebke, a veteran Durham lawmaker.

This year’s crossover is more tame than years past, lobbyists and lawmakers said, because the House limited the number of bills each member could sponsor to 10. But it’s still messy, veterans said, and the adage about lawmaking and sausage-making is frequently mentioned this time of year. “I don’t have time to get into the technicalities of the bill,” Rep. Jeff Collins of Rocky Mount said at one point Wednesday, asking for his colleagues’ support.

Eight-term veteran Rep. John Blust acknowledged that crossover is sloppy. “It does create a situation when I don’t think we are giving enough scrutiny to them,” the Greensboro Republican said.

Through his eyes

For freshman Rep. Jim Fulghum, a Raleigh Republican, the week seemed overwhelming at times. Bills flashed across his computer too fast to read before a vote. And a Styrofoam coffee cup became an appendage. “I’m surprised there is order in the chaos,” he said.

As a physician and former neurosurgeon, Fulghum was keenly interested in health legislation. As the deadline neared Wednesday, he tracked a bill to require health insurance companies to cover autism.

“You going to be with us or not?” asked lobbyist John Cooper, as Fulghum left the House floor at an intermission. Cooper was lobbying for Autism Speaks. Fulghum demurred. He didn’t mention his amendments planned for the floor debate. “Don’t hurt me too bad,” Cooper added.

Fulghum walked barely 20 paces before being stopped by a lobbyist for Blue Cross and Blue Shield, an insurance company that opposed the bill. “Just say no,” the lobbyist told Fulghum as he continued to another meeting with his now-empty coffee cup in one hand and a briefcase stuffed with papers in the other.

“There are a lot of moving parts, and everybody is trying to get last things added here and there,” he said.

In the halls, lobbyists and lawmakers call him “Doc.”

“Oh, I hate that,” he said, climbing the stairs to a Republican caucus meeting. “I guess it’s a term of endearment, but I just never liked that.”

Before the meeting starts, he excuses himself to take a call on his cellphone from Wake County Sheriff Donnie Harrison. The sheriff wanted Fulghum to vote against giving rank-and-file deputies and other local law enforcement officers whistle-blower protections. Fulghum didn’t even know the bill was on the calendar.

A late night, early morning

The House resumed just after 7 p.m., but Fulghum was absent. Fulghum, a diabetic after a kidney transplant years ago, had returned to his legislative office in the satellite building to check his blood sugar. He didn’t feel so good. Emily Roberson, his daughter and legislative assistant, offered him a sandwich from the mini-fridge.

Fulghum returned to the floor in time for the autism bill. He introduced an amendment to require certified treatment providers, which a bill supporter argued would gut the bill. His amendment failed. Fulghum voted for the bill anyway, though he wished it covered more children with autism.

The action moved more quickly throughout the night, and decorum deteriorated. The House speaker waived rule 12(h) requiring a tie on the floor at 8:45 p.m. Lawmakers passed around Krispy Kreme doughnuts. Fulghum refilled his cup with tea.

Three hours later when the members adjourned, after approving more than 40 bills in a roughly 10-hour session, Fulghum said he felt relieved. He acknowledged he didn’t get a chance to read every measure completely before the votes but relied on others to point him in the right direction.

He turned to Blust, the veteran, to get his take. “There’s no way you can read them all,” Blust consoled him.

The next morning, Fulghum was back at the statehouse for an 8:30 a.m. committee meeting.

In his legislative office, he studied the Thursday calendar with his daughter and then returned to the House floor.

By the end, Fulghum said he felt as invigorated as tired. “I don’t think it blew by too fast,” Fulghum concluded.

Staff writer Lynn Bonner and researcher David Raynor contributed to this report.

Frank: 919-829-4698

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service