NC bridges are safe, DOT engineer says

bsiceloff@newsobserver.comMay 24, 2013 

NCBRIDGES02-NE-052413-CCS

A car heads eastbound on Hillsborough St. as it drives under the I-440 Beltline bridge in Raleigh, NC on May 24, 2013. This is one of the oldest bridges in the city.

CHRIS SEWARD — cseward@newsobserver.com Buy Photo

  • N.C. bridges fall short of standards

    • Two out of every five bridges maintained by the state Department of Transportation are rated as substandard – either structurally deficient or functionally obsolete, or both – but state officials say all North Carolina bridges are safe.

    • 2,663 – one-fifth of DOT’s 13,500 bridges – are structurally deficient. Age, wear and tear or an outmoded design can weaken these bridges. Repairs and maintenance are required to keep them safe. Weight limits are posted to keep heavy trucks off some bridges.

    • 4,479 – one-third of the bridges – are functionally obsolete. These bridges may be too narrow, too low, poorly aligned with the roadway or otherwise inadequate for traffic demands.

    Triangle bridge work ahead

    During the next three years, DOT plans to replace 22 aging bridges that are three or more lanes wide in Wake, Durham and Johnston counties.

    Major bridges scheduled for replacement over the coming decade include:

    • Wade Avenue bridge over Capital Boulevard, built in 1954, and Capital Boulevard bridge over Peace Street, built in 1948. Construction starts in 2016 ($13 million).

    • I-440 bridge over Hillsborough Street, built in 1960, and other bridges in a planned $102 million project to widen I-440 in West Raleigh. Starts in 2018.

    • U.S. 70 bridge over N.C. 50 (Benson Road) in Garner, built in 1954. Starts in 2019 ($8.2 million).

    Underway now in Wake County are projects worth $10.5 million to replace eight bridges on secondary roads. DOT is spending an additional $7.8 million for preservation and repairs to prolong the life of 15 Wake bridges on secondary roads and freeways.

    Source: NCDOT

— A senior state transportation official ordered extra inspections of truss bridges like one that collapsed Thursday on an interstate highway in Washington state, but he said Friday that North Carolina’s 13,500 state-maintained bridges are safe.

“We have our two-year bridge inspection program, and we crawl all over every bridge we have,” said Terry Gibson, chief engineer for the state Department of Transportation. “If we find a problem, we address it.”

Like other states, North Carolina has struggled to reduce a backlog of aging bridges overdue for replacement. The legislature has set aside more money for the effort – $450 million in the past two years. DOT has modernized its strategy for rebuilding the worst bridges and aiming rehab efforts at others to prolong their useful lives.

Advocates for transportation investment say the state is making progress, but not enough.

“We are in a big hole to begin with,” said Charles Hodges, executive director of NC Go, a nonprofit group that lobbies for road and transit improvements. “The good news is that they’ve got some practices in place that are moving the process forward more quickly than in years past. And they are still allocating extra funds to correct the problem. But it’s hard to imagine we’ll ever be caught up.”

DOT replaced more than 560 bridges and did preservation work on 450 more over the past two years, Gibson said. He said 736 bridges that were rated in poor condition will be elevated into the “good” category when these projects are completed.

He spoke a day after a four-lane Interstate 5 bridge span fell into the Skagit River north of Seattle on Thursday evening. Washington authorities blamed a too-tall truck that struck the overhead steel truss frame supporting the structure. Three people were rescued from two cars that fell into the river.

North Carolina has 35 truss-style bridges, Gibson said.

“I’m going to ask our division offices to go out and take a look at their truss bridges to make sure they’re safe,” Gibson said. “We don’t expect to find any issues.”

After 13 people died in the 2007 collapse of a freeway bridge in Minnesota, North Carolina officials said they would need to quadruple the pace of bridge replacement – then about 200 new bridges a year – to catch up with the demand.

Gibson said DOT makes its bridge dollars go farther these days.

“It used to be the way we approached bridges was, we replaced them,” Gibson said. “Now we’re learning we can go in and strengthen the columns or rehabilitate the bridge deck, and keep it in good condition. We can get a lot of life out of a bridge for less money.”

Hodges and Gibson said DOT also is saving time and reducing costs by bundling small bridges together in “express design-build” jobs.

Separate, multimillion-dollar contracts are still required for big freeway structures such as Capital Boulevard and Interstate 440 Beltline bridges that date from the 1940s to the 1960s. But DOT now combines smaller, two-lane bridges to give a single contractor two or three years to design and build seven to 10 bridges on different roads.

The AAA Carolinas motor club keeps tabs on the state’s aging bridges and highlights the worst bridges that carry the most traffic. Last year’s 20-worst list included three in Wake – on I-40, I-440 and Capital Boulevard – that are slated for rehabilitation or replacement.

“A lack of funding has resulted in a significant number of substandard bridges in North Carolina,” said Angela Daley, spokeswoman for the Charlotte-based group. “There’s certainly more that needs to be done.”

Gibson told a House-Senate transportation panel last year that the added funds were helping DOT reduce its bridge backlog, but it was important not to divert too much money away from highway repaving and other road needs.

Legislators appear likely to reserve more than $300 million of DOT’s $3 billion budget for bridge needs over the next two years. As state leaders match shrinking gas tax revenues with growing transportation needs, Gibson said Friday, that looks like the right amount.

“We need to make sure we’re balancing our approach,” he said. “You can get too excited and put too much money there (into bridges). If we pull too much money from our resurfacing, then that side of the house starts to look bad.”

Siceloff: 919-829-4527 or blogs.newsobserver.com/crosstown or twitter.com/Road_Worrier/

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service