Women’s College Basketball

NCAA Report: Collegiate women's basketball at a crossroads

lkeeley@newsobserver.comJune 28, 2013 

  • Highlights of women’s college basketball report

    •  During the 2012-13 season, Division I women’s teams shot an average of 38.9 percent on field-goal attempts and 30.57 percent on

    3-point attempts, both all-time lows. Scoring also hit an all-time low of 62.12 points per team per game, down nearly eight points from


    •  During the 2012-13 NCAA season, only one D-I school averaged more than 10,000 fans per game (Tennessee at 11,390).

    This figure was more than 3,000 fans per game fewer than Tennessee’s average the year before.

    •  During the 2013 D-I women’s tournament, an average of 4,850 fans attended games in the first and second rounds. Although this figure represented an increase of 957 fans per session over the 2012 tournament, it was only the 12th highest first- and second-round session average since the tournament

    began in 1982.

    Source: NCAA.org

Collegiate women’s basketball is at a crossroads.

Overall attendance is stagnant, if not in decline. The NCAA tournament’s attendance is shrinking. Scoring and shooting percentages are at an all-time low. There are no fewer than 10 governing bodies that attempt to regulate some aspect of the sport.

These were some of the conclusions from an NCAA-commissioned, six-month study undertaken by Val Ackerman, the founding president of the WNBA and past president of USA Basketball. Her findings, along with recommendations for how to grow and improve the game, were presented in a 52-page white paper delivered on June 15 to Mark Lewis, the NCAA executive vice president of championships and alliances, and Anucha Browne, the NCAA vice president of women’s basketball championships.

There was another notable conclusion from Ackerman’s work: there is a tremendous appetite for change.

And that thought was echoed locally.

“What’s happening, it’s really a welcome thing,” said Duke coach Joanne P. McCallie. “I don’t want it to stall in any way.”

The NCAA began to act on the Ackerman report this week. The NCAA Division I Women’s Basketball Committee announced it will immediately allow regional host institutions to play on their home courts, which was among the suggestions contained in the report.

The committee also said it will establish a “women’s basketball stakeholders’ summit,” at the 2014 Women’s Final Four. Other changes that could begin with the 2015 season would also be considered, according to the NCAA committee, including:

•  shifting of weekend playing dates for the Women’s Final Four from Sunday-Tuesday to Friday-Sunday.

•  possible first- and second-round byes for as many as the top-32 seeds, so that lower-seeded teams play each other in earlier rounds.

•  combining the Women’s Final Four with the Division II and Division III Women’s Basketball Championships in Indianapolis in the Summer Olympics year of 2016.

The ACC has worked closely with Ackerman throughout her information gathering process, as she spent two days at the league’s annual spring meetings at Amelia Island, Fla. Ackerman met with coaches and administrators, collecting input that went into influencing her paper.

After those meetings, the ACC formed a strategic women’s basketball planning group, and that committee convened in Greensboro, to review the white paper, according to UNC coach Sylvia Hatchell.

The group came up with three main priorities: improve the NCAA tournament, evaluate the rules and officiating of the rules, and focus on skill and coaching development.

Hatchell sees an easy solution to several of the issues.

“It’s really simple. Enforce the rules, clean up the game, keep it from being so physical,” she said. “Then the skill level is better, the coaching is better, scores are higher, TV coverage is better, the ratings are higher, attendance is better. It’s a domino effect. It all starts with the game not being as physical and it being more of an offensive game.”

McCallie was hesitant to use the phrase “clean up the game,” saying that fans don’t want to see the whistle blow constantly. One of her favorite proposals to improve play is the implementation of a 24-second shot clock, already in place in the WNBA.

McCallie is most concerned with seeing quick action – even if it’s not action she would prefer.

“I’m okay with somebody making a decision and I’m not for it,” she said. “In other words, I don’t think this should be a big democracy. Basically, some people that have done the research and some others, a small group of people, need to forward this.

“We’ve just got to simply try. This is a time to be all-in, and to trust the leadership and the research that has been done.”

Final Four sites are set for the next three years – Nashville (2014), Tampa (2015) and Indianapolis (2016) – but, after that, the event could go in a different direction. It could attempt to find a permanent host, like the College World Series has in Omaha, Neb., or it could try to package itself with the men’s Final Four, creating a super showcase of college basketball.

The possible changes to the game are numerous and extend beyond the season’s final event.

That’s a big picture idea, and the white paper has several more specific thoughts, too (for example: improve the quality and knowledge of TV announcers). What’s most important to those involved though, is that the paper translates into tangible action. And the sooner, the better.

Keeley 919-829-4556; Twitter @laurakeeley

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service