Fiery debate in NC Senate, then approval of abortion restrictions afrank@newsobserver.comJuly 3, 2013 

  • The rest of the bill

    Lost in the last-minute rewrite of the “sharia law” bill may be the fact that the Senate also approved the original bill outlawing Islamic law.

    House Bill 695, which passed the House in May along party lines, except for a lone Republican who voted against it, doesn’t include the terms sharia or Islamic, although it was clear from the floor debate that that’s what it was about.

    Some conservatives have insisted in recent years that Islamic law threatens to take over the world. A number of state legislatures have passed similar laws, and some of them have been struck down by the courts as discriminatory.

    The bill specifies that foreign law cannot be considered in divorce, child custody or support, alimony or equitable distribution cases if that would violate any party’s constitutional rights.

    Staff writer Craig Jarvis

  • How the Triangle delegation voted Voting Yes

    Sen. Neal Hunt, a Raleigh Republican

    Sen. Chad Barefoot, a Wake County Republican

    Voting No

    Sen. Dan Blue, a Raleigh Democrat

    Sen, Ellie Kinnaird, a Chapel Hill Democrat

    Sen. Floyd McKissick, a Durham Democrat

    Sen. Josh Stein, a Raleigh Democrat

    Sen. Mike Woodard, a Durham Democrat


    Sen. Tamara Barringer, a Cary Republican

— Sweeping new rules that could limit abortions in the state passed the state Senate along party lines Wednesday after a fiery debate that roused spectators and led the lieutenant governor to order onlookers removed from the gallery.

The Senate passed the bill by a vote of 29-12 after a debate that invoked faith, constitutional rights and health statistics.

The bill’s supporters say the proposal will increase safety, but opponents said the real intent is to restrict abortions. The bill now goes to the House for consideration. That chamber has already approved some of the provisions in the bill. It isn’t clear whether the House will approve the new restrictions, but Rep. Paul Stam, an Apex Republican, indicated some support Wednesday.

“The prolife provisions of the bill are supported by a large majority of North Carolinians,” he said. “They don’t want their taxes used to pay for abortions for others.”

After the Senate vote, people in the hall began chanting, “Shame, shame, shame.” A woman in the gallery who yelled “Shame on you” was arrested.

“This is an atrocious, shameful bill,” said Sen. Earline Parmon, a Winston-Salem Democrat. “It’s about dictating to women about very personal medical decisions that should be left to a woman and her doctor. This is going to cause more back-alley abortions, whether you want to admit it or not.”

Sen. Warren Daniel, a Morganton Republican, said the bill was about keeping women safe.

“We’re not here today taking away the rights of women,” he said. “We’re taking away the rights of an industry to have substandard conditions.”

Many of the women gathered outside said they were outraged by the surprise preliminary Senate vote Tuesday night to add more restrictions on surgical and medical abortions. The provisions, tacked onto an unrelated bill that says foreign laws can’t be recognized in family court, requires abortion clinics to meet standards similar to those for outpatient surgery clinics. It also requires doctors to be present when women take pills that induce abortions.

The bill includes a raft of provisions advocated by abortion opponents – similar to those being debated and adopted by other states.

“This bill is big,” said Elizabeth Nash, state issues manager at the Guttmacher Institute, a research and policy analysis group with offices in New York and Washington.

The nonprofit supports abortion rights, but groups on both sides of the abortion debate cite its data.

Requirements costly

Critics of the bill say the provision requiring abortion clinics to meet standards similar to those for outpatient surgical centers would effectively close the majority of the state’s 16 licensed abortion clinics. Legislators and legislative staff know of only one clinic in Asheville that would meet new license requirements.

Under the bill, the Department of Health and Human Services would come up with specific guidelines for North Carolina abortion clinics to meet. The agency could come up with its own rules or copy federal regulations.

Standards typically include specifications for hallway widths, ventilation and parking spaces, and getting abortion clinics up to par could involve renovations or moving to new buildings.

“It’s quite expensive, and the costs are quite enormous to comply with these things,” said Melissa Reed, vice president for public affairs for Planned Parenthood Health Systems. She described the legislation as “cost-prohibitive” for providers.

Virginia passed a bill in 2011 calling for abortion clinics to follow ambulatory surgical center standards by 2014. Planned Parenthood estimated that it would cost each of its three Virginia abortion clinics hundreds of thousands of dollars to comply, according to rough estimates.

Protections and restrictions

Three provisions in the bill are similar to legislation that has already passed the House:

• A ban on abortions based on the gender of the fetus.

• A prohibition on abortion insurance coverage in any health care plan offered to state residents through the Affordable Care Act, except in cases of rape, incest or danger to the life of the mother.

• An expansion of protection to health-care workers to refuse to perform abortions on ethical or religious grounds.

Other provisions in the bill would stop local governments from covering abortion in their employee benefit plans. Currently, each city and county can decide what benefits to offer its employees.

“If this were to become law, … those (city or county) health plans could not have coverage on abortions that was different or greater than what the state health plan provides,” said Paul Meyer, director of governmental affairs for the League of Municipalities.

The state plan pays for abortion only in cases of rape, incest or danger to the mother’s life.

The league does not have a position on the bill, but the county commissioners’ association said the legislature should let commissioners make decisions about employee health insurance.

“It’s really an issue of local autonomy, local decision-making,” said Todd McGee, communications director for the N.C. Association of County Commissioners.

The bill also requires doctors to be present when a woman takes pills to induce abortion. Women take two medications a few days apart. Women usually take the second at home and return to the doctor for a follow-up visit.

In 2011, the most recent year for which data are available, 23.4 percent of the 26,192 abortions done in North Carolina were drug-induced, while 75.1 percent were from surgical procedures.

At least nine states have laws requiring doctors be present when women take pills inducing abortions, according to the Guttmacher Institute.

“When these bills have been floated around in other states, they have the effect of inhibiting choice and eliminating choice,” said Senate Minority Leader Martin Nesbitt, an Asheville Democrat.

But Senate leader Phil Berger said critics were mischaracterizing the bill. “We’re not overturning Roe v. Wade,” he said.

Safety debated

Throughout the debate, Republicans hammered that unsafe clinics are operating in the state. Sen. Chad Barefoot, a Republican from Wake Forest, talked in detail about a Charlotte clinic that was shut down twice since 2007 over safety concerns and reopened. The clinic closed briefly this year after investigators found staff were having patients swallow a drug that should have been injected.

Democrats countered that because the clinic was shut down, the state’s oversight was working.

Since 2008, there have been 23 complaints to the state Department of Health and Human Services against licensed abortion clinics, according to the agency.

Democrats also argued that abortion is safe and that Viagra has resulted in more deaths. Sen. Josh Stein cited research from the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals that Viagra causes five deaths per 100,000 prescriptions, while an abortion-inducing pill causes less than 1 death per 100,000 prescriptions.

Democrats said the bill should require doctors to stay with men who take Viagra. Sen. Ellie Kinnaird filed an amendment that would require that, but Republicans shelved it without a vote.

Many in the crowd watching the debate laughed and applauded the Viagra references, but their signs of support for Democrats’ arguments drew reprimands from Lt. Gov. Dan Forest. He also chided onlookers who waved their hands in silent support.

Sen. Kathy Harrington, a Republican from Gastonia, chastised Democrats for their Viagra argument.

“To liken taking Viagra to giving a woman medication to lose her unborn child is unconscionable,” she said. “This is a procedure where an unborn child loses its life. It should be taken very seriously.”

‘Christmas in July’

On the Christian Action League website, Executive Director Mark Creech called the bill “Christmas in July.”

“In all my days, I have never seen a bill so full of good content,” he wrote. “I have shared with my friends that the legislation is a veritable Christmas tree of beautiful lights and ornaments representing life, justice, and other righteous principles. The only thing missing is the crowning star of final passage and the Governor’s signature.”

It was unclear Wednesday what Gov. Pat McCrory would do if the bill passes the House and makes it to his desk. During the 2012 campaign, McCrory said he would not sign more abortion restrictions into law. He did not say this week what he thought about the bill, but he did criticize the process.

“When the Democrats were in power, this is the way they did business,” McCrory said in a statement. “It was not right then, and it’s not right now. Regardless of what party is in charge or what important issue is being discussed, the process must be appropriate and thorough.”

Senate Democrats complained that Senate Republicans sprang the bill out of committee without public notice.

Berger shot back at both McCrory and the Democrats, saying some of the provisions in the bill have been in legislation sitting in committees for months, and the proposal was debated over two days.

“Gov. McCrory shared some thoughts on the legislative process,” Berger said in the statement. “It’s understandable that he is not familiar with it, so I want to provide some perspective.”

Before the vote was taken, senators started a debate on faith and values when Republican Sen. Ralph Hise of Spruce Pine said he couldn’t sit silently while others spoke “words of death.”

“I ask each of you to consider what type of society we want and what life we value in the state of North Carolina,” he said.

Sen. Angela Bryant, a Rocky Mount Democrat, said she had her own beliefs that shouldn’t be subordinated to someone else’s.

“I have an equal right to that, just as your families have the right to access what you believe in,” she said.

Staff writer Craig Jarvis contributed.

Bonner: 919-829-4821

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service