From the Editor

Drescher: Identify finalists for public jobs

jdrescher@newsobserver.comJuly 5, 2013 

The Wake school board has been divided on many issues during the last four years. But it was united recently on one – it decided to name finalists for its superintendent job and to have those finalists meet the public.

The board named three finalists, who toured schools and took questions from residents at a forum. A few weeks later, James Merrill, the Virginia Beach superintendent, was hired.

Identifying the finalists is an effective approach for filling high-profile public jobs. Durham used a similar approach to choose its police chief in 2007. So did Raleigh in naming its last two police chiefs, including Cassandra Deck-Brown this year. The state community college board chose its current president in 2007 after publicly identifying finalists.

Good for all concerned

Let’s hope this becomes standard procedure. Naming finalists enables the candidates and the public to get to know each other. It’s also an important step for the hiring agency to check out the candidate’s record. Announcing finalists helps surface information about a candidate and helps the hiring agency manage its risk. No privately conducted background check is as effective.

In North Carolina, UNC campus boards generally have not named finalists for chancellor jobs, even though doing so has been effective. When Appalachian State University was looking for a new chancellor in 2004, the search committee named six finalists who visited the Boone campus and met with students, professors and community members. The committee recommended three finalists, and the UNC system president chose Ken Peacock, former dean of the College of Business.

Peacock, a Rocky Mount native, has been a successful chancellor. Now 65, he has announced his retirement. Peacock told me this week that if asked, he would recommend that finalists to succeed him be named and visit the campus.

Of his session with the faculty in 2004, Peacock said, “You got to hear what they were looking for. Do we need to be a more research-oriented institution? Do we need to add more programs? It was very informative to me to hear the questions and see what the faculty wished for its university to be. I found it very helpful.”

Peacock said the process serves both the university community and the candidates, especially candidates from outside the university. “They need to see how they fit and how they interact with the faculty and staff,” he said.

No harm done

Opponents of publicly naming finalists say it deters good candidates from applying. No doubt there are some candidates who might not apply, especially if the new job is a lateral move. But being a finalist at a top-notch organization and not getting the job doesn’t hurt a candidate whose career is on the rise.

Ann Clark, deputy superintendent of the Charlotte-Mecklenburg schools, was a finalist for the Wake schools job but lost on a split vote. Several Wake school board members raved about her. Did it hurt her career to not get the top job in Wake? Doubtful. Her board in Charlotte knows it’s lucky to employ a potential future big-system superintendent.

The next high-profile public job in the Triangle to be filled is that of Raleigh city manager. If Mayor Nancy McFarlane and the Raleigh City Council want to manage their risk and engage the community, they will name the finalists and bring them to Raleigh to meet the people who pay the bills.

Drescher: 919-829-4515 or On Twitter @john_drescher

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service