Point of View

Selling NCSU's Hofmann Forest a violation on many levels

July 9, 2013 


  • More information

    Want to go?

    Those against the sale of Hofmann Forest will meet at the Dorothy and Roy Park Alumni Center on Centennial Campus at 4 p.m. today. Ron Sutherland says, “We’ll even give you a free tree for showing up. Maybe you can plant it where the sidewalk ends!”

Remember Shel Silverstein’s book “The Giving Tree” – the one where the boy just takes and takes and the tree just gives and gives until one day the tree gets cut down? Well, I’ve come to believe that N.C. State University must be using the “Giving Tree” as its business book du jour this year, considering its abusive plans for Hofmann Forest.

Let’s review the story: The founding Dean of the College of Forestry (now College of Natural Resources) Julius Hofmann managed to buy the forest around the time of the Great Depression, knowing even then that an 80,000-acre tract was a rare and wonderful resource for his fledgling program. With careful management, Hofmann succeeded in making the forest more than pay for itself. After the mortgage was paid off, the forest went on to spend decade after decade supporting the outstanding forestry program at NCSU, not just as a cash cow, but as a resource for teaching and research as well. Hofmann, I’ve been told, is the largest university-owned forest tract in the world.

But now, after some clever maneuvering by short-sighted ex-deans of the college and their cronies, the Forestry Foundation that controlled the forest has been subsumed into the Natural Resources Foundation, with only one practicing forester left on the NRF board. With little attachment to the forest, and with dollar signs in its eyes, this NRF board decided to sell Hofmann and convert it into a mixed portfolio of stocks and bonds. Never mind that Wall Street returns have been wretched over the last (lost?) decade. In fact, that was part of the problem – the rest of the college’s endowment funds tanked during the Great Recession, placing even more pressure on always-profitable Hofmann to produce unsustainable returns.

Here’s the outrageous part: Hofmann Forest is actually owned by the State of North Carolina! The deed was transferred to the NCSU Endowment Fund back in 1977. So in effect, here we have a private foundation deciding to sell an 80,000-acre forest that belongs to you and me, and the NRF is doing it right at the bottom of the timberland market (“sell low” must be a business lesson from another children’s book I suppose).

Not only is this a clear violation of the NRF and the Endowment Fund’s fiduciary responsibilities, but it also is a phenomenal betrayal of the public interest in North Carolina. Imagine if the Division of Parks and Recreation unexpectedly decided to sell a dozen of our state parks (which would barely add up to the size of Hofmann) – we just wouldn’t stand for it! Hofmann Forest is more than a simple investment for the university; it always has been, since the very day it was wisely set aside by Dean Hofmann.

A robust case could be made that the act of selling Hofmann Forest is a violation of the Constitution of North Carolina. Here’s the relevant text: “It shall be the policy of this State to conserve and protect its lands and waters for the benefit of all its citizenry, and to this end it shall be a proper function of the State of North Carolina and its political subdivisions to acquire and preserve park, recreational, and scenic areas.”

Couldn’t be clearer. It is our state policy to conserve our land for all of our residents. Selling a huge tract of forest currently owned by the state can only be construed as a direct violation of this policy, and the NCSU Endowment Fund and Board of Trustees will have a lot to answer for if they let the sale proceed when the board meets today.

Ron Sutherland, Ph.D., of Durham is a conservation scientist with the Wildlands Network.

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service