Editor's note: A story Thursday about Eben Alexander III's book "Proof of Heaven" incorrectly stated that he became ill with a virus in 2008. He actually became ill with a bacterial infection.
An author born and educated in North Carolina is facing accusations that he lied in his best-selling book that details his near-death experience and what he says was his journey to heaven and back.
Neurosurgeon Eben Alexander III has been touring the country and inspiring people since publishing Proof of Heaven in 2012. He has appeared on Oprah, Fox & Friends and on the cover of Newsweek, and his book has sold almost 2 million copies.
But his story recently came under fire in an in-depth investigative profile by Luke Dittrich in Esquire magazine. Dittrich, an Esquire contributing editor, says he found incorrect details in the book and uncovered malpractice lawsuits against Alexander where Alexander admitted lying to cover his mistakes. Dittrich says this pattern of deception led him to conclude that Alexander was essentially down on his luck when he became sick and used the near-death experience to reinvent himself.
Alexander was born in Charlotte, went to UNC-Chapel Hill and later Duke Universitys medical school. He is a famed neurosurgeon who has taught at Harvard Medical School. He now lives in Lynchburg, Va.
He became ill with a bacterial infection in 2008 that placed him in a weeklong coma and almost killed him. During that time, Alexander said, he visited heaven and saw fantastical sights and met a being who told him he was loved.
Proof of Heaven is just one of many books about people who have had near-death experiences and say they saw heaven. The authors often tell of beautiful light, meeting dead loved ones and of the overwhelming and all-encompassing presence of God. Other well-known books include 90 Minutes in Heaven and Heaven Is for Real, which details the experience of a 4-year-old child.
What makes Alexanders account stand out from others near-death experiences is his background in science and neurosurgery. Alexander has said that when he first woke up he thought his memories of heaven werent real. But as he applied his knowledge of the brain as a neurosurgeon, he said he finally had to accept that his experience actually happened.
Alexander said his medical records, which have not been released, show that he had no activity in his brains cortex at the time, making him unable to hallucinate or dream the experience therefore it must have happened to his soul, outside of the physical realm.
But according to Dittrich in his article published this month, a doctor who treated Alexander said that he was put in a medically-induced coma which he came out of multiple times, conscious but delirious, meaning Alexander had the brain activity needed to have hallucinated the trip to heaven. Dittrich also shows other events in the book to be false. For example, National Weather Service data show that the rainbow Alexander claimed appeared when he woke up could not have happened.
I think there are some extraordinary claims in that book, and they require investigation, Dittrich said in an interview. So thats what I did, I investigated it.
I stand by every word
Alexander could not be reached for comment; a representative from his publisher, Simon & Schuster, said he is traveling and wont be available for interviews until the fall. But Alexander did release a statement.
I stand by every word in this book and have made its message the purpose of my life, he wrote. Esquires cynical article distorts the facts of my 25-year career as a neurosurgeon and is a textbook example of how unsupported assertions and cherry-picked information can be assembled at the expense of the truth.
Thats not how Dittrich sees it.
People buy something thats sold to them as non-fiction called Proof of Heaven, and the account is based on a variety of things, including the professional credentials of the person whos telling the story, Dittrich said. I think readers deserve to know the full story, and I dont think that full story was presented in the book at all.
It is Alexanders claim of proof, rather than the telling of a subjective experience, that has frustrated critics.
Writing in the Atlantic magazine last December, Dr. Oliver Sacks, a professor of neurology at the NYU School of Medicine, said Alexanders account didnt prove anything. Sacks has written frequently on the functions of the brain, including, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Hallucinations published in November.
The one most plausible hypothesis in Dr. Alexanders case, then, is that his (near-death experience) occurred not during his coma, but as he was surfacing from the coma and his cortex was returning to full function, Sacks writes. It is curious that he does not allow this obvious and natural explanation, but instead insists on a supernatural one.
But others disagree with these criticisms.
John Bond Gillam III, Alexanders cousin and president of the Outer Banks Relief Foundation, said he read Dittrichs article in Esquire and understood its arguments but thinks they are wrong. Gillam said the issue of whether Alexanders brain was conscious during the coma is just a matter of semantics.
He has a great message, and his near-death experience brings great hope, brings peace and brings love, he said. I dont know why anyone would want to negate that to prove a point.
Outer Banks talk
Alexander is scheduled to give talks in Kill Devil Hills and other Outer Banks communities in August, and Gillam said attendees arent concerned about the Esquire article.
As far as the people Ive talked to whove read the article, its a total non-issue, he said.
Robert Mays, a near-death experience researcher and treasurer of the International Association for Near Death Studies based in Durham, said the Esquire article presents a distorted and unfair picture of Alexanders experience. Mays said the articles individual arguments either dont show the full picture or can be explained.
But as a researcher, Mays also acknowledged that the book doesnt offer undisputed proof of heaven.
I think his is as compelling as many other near-death experiences, and how compelling it is depends upon who youre trying to convince, Mays said.
For instance, even though there are many accounts of near-death experiences that include unexplainable circumstances, Mays said a skeptical scientist would not be convinced something involving a soul occurred. That scientist would require the phenomenon to be repeated in a controlled experiment to believe the experience was anything more than a hallucination.
But for those who have had their own near-death experience and seen heaven, the knowledge of what they saw and felt, along with the similar accounts of others such as Alexander, is enough proof, he said.
The whole idea of proof is problematic, said Mays. It really depends upon, What does it take to prove?