Meditations on Money Management

Focus on a money manager's fees, even though they'd rather you didn’t

August 24, 2013 

Quickly flip through a stack of bills on your desk. I am not asking you to get upset at how much you owe the electric company, your cellphone carrier or the cable provider. I just want you to recognize that all your other service providers, save money managers, tell you exactly how much you owe in dollars and cents.

Now dig out your latest brokerage or mutual fund statement, and try to figure out how much you paid to have your money managed. I’ll keep writing while you flip through your financial statements.

Money management is one of the most ingenious businesses on the planet. It’s not their brilliance at managing money that stands out. Not at all. As a whole they’re mediocre at their central task, but they are superstars when it comes to billing. The key to their billing success derives from the fact that they don’t charge in dollars and cents. Money managers prefer to debit you in “basis points.” If your mutual fund charges you 150 basis points per year, which is 1.5 percent of your average account balance, you owe $150 per year on a $10,000 account. This charge covers management of the money, accounting and marketing. Most of you also pay a separate charge, called a 12b-1, which covers your mutual fund’s marketing expenses. You might be a bit more reticent about the fee if you were writing a check for $150 every year.

Steep price to pay

Charging in basis points and having you pick up the marketing expense only begin to demonstrate the cleverness of the money management industry. They don’t need to send you a bill. Instead, they quietly debit your account during the year for the $150 in small amounts, so you don’t even notice. It’s all perfectly legal and spelled out in detail in the prospectus. As long as money managers are talking basis points, you’re not quite as focused on how much you’re paying for their services. The industry works the same magic with “sophisticated institutional investors.” No hedge fund manager in his right mind would tell a client that a $200 million mandate is going to cost them $4 million in management fees, plus another $4 million or $5 million in performance fees. It sounds much better as: “We charge the standard 2-percent fee, plus 20 percent of the profits.” Believe me, this form of billing works.

I’m sure you’ve stopped searching for the amount you paid to your money manager as you’ve either read the previous two paragraphs or realized on your own that the amount is not to be found. Whether it’s 150 basis points or $150, it doesn’t sound so expensive. But it is a steep price, because the industry wants you to look at the fee as a percentage of your average account balance, not as a percentage of the amount of money they make for you.

Returns vs. fees

Think about it this way: Why would you pay anyone a fee for managing the money you already have? You could put the money in a bank or Treasury bill (granted at a very low rate of interest), and you wouldn’t owe a management fee at all. So the real question is how much of the increase in the value of your investment is going to be paid out in fees. Let’s assume your $10,000 account increased by 8 percent, or $800. The annual fee would be about $156 (in this case the average balance was more than $10,000 during the year because of appreciation, so the fee is more than a flat $150).

You paid $156 in fees to generate a gain of $644 (before taxes). Nearly 20 percent of your profits went to pay fees, and we’re not even looking at trading costs. It doesn’t much matter if you invest in a bond or equity fund, a hedge fund, or private equity. It’s going to cost you somewhere between 20 percent and 40 percent of the gains in your account to pay for the care and feeding of the manager and associated expenses. And, if the investment doesn’t work out, you’ll still have to pay a fee. Now that’s a great business model ... for the industry.

Most money managers advise clients to focus on their returns and not the fees. They argue that if the returns are good, the fees are well worth it. Unfortunately, you have to agree to the fee schedule before the manager produces investment results and, of course, most of the returns are mediocre. You can’t control the markets, and you are unlikely to ever get a properly itemized bill from a money manager, so you might as well drive down those basis points as far as possible.

Andrew Silton is a retired money manager living in Chapel Hill. He was CIO for the North Carolina Retirement System from 2002-2005. He writes the blog http://meditationonmoneymanagement.blogspot.com/

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service