Duke beats Troy 38-31

lkeeley@newsobserver.comSeptember 28, 2013 

Troy Duke Football

Duke's Josh Snead (9) catches a pass in front of Troy's Keion Payne during Duke’s 38-31 victory on on Saturday at Wallace Wade Stadium in Durham.

CHRISTINE T. NGUYEN — AP

— It was deathly quiet in the tunnel going into Duke’s locker room at halftime. The Blue Devils had a seven-point lead, but it was another shootout, another “score, match score, score, match score” type of game, to use Duke coach David Cutcliffe’s description.

The defense was on its heels most of the first half, as the Blue Devils had trouble adjusting to the rhythm of Troy’s no-huddle offense. But thanks to halftime adjustments in alignment and attitude, Duke’s defense was able to make several key stops in the second half to preserve a 38-31 win Saturday at Wallace Wade Stadium.

After the game, several defensive players credited their collective decision to go out and get after the quarterback as the difference in the two halves. Troy (2-3) scored 21 first-half points, a touchdown on the first drive of the second half and then just a field goal the rest of the way. But Cutcliffe pointed to a more concrete change.

“They would make a substitution, and that’s fine, the tempo of that wasn’t as fast as what we go sometimes, but then they’d just suddenly turn around, get on the ball, and snap it quickly, and we were kind of on our heels,” Cutcliffe said. “Ultimately, we got aggressive because we got our butts lined up and ready to play. And I did make a big point about that. You can’t play defense on your heels.”

Duke (3-2, 0-2 ACC) limited the Trojans to 146 yards after their touchdown to open the second half, which tied the score at 28. The defensive line – which couldn’t touch Pitt quarterback Tom Savage last week – recorded three second-half sacks (one apiece for Dezmond Johnson, Justin Foxx and Jonathan Woodruff), two additional tackles for loss (Johnson and Kenny Anunike) and deflected two passes as well (Jamal Wallace and Anunike).

“We definitely intensified as the game went on, and that’s a positive, that’s always want you want, to get better as the game progresses,” Anunike said.

The sixth-year senior defensive end came up big for Duke on the game’s pivotal drive. The offense went three-and-out with the Blue Devils holding a tenuous 35-31 lead with just over seven minutes left in the game. The defense needed to force a stop. After collecting one first down, the Trojans committed a holding penalty – one of four in the second half, including one that wiped out a go-ahead, 56-yard touchdown pass. Facing first-and-20, Anunike busted a swing pass for a six-yard loss.

On third-and-26, Anunike dropped back like a linebacker and deflected away a Corey Robinson pass, forcing a punt. The Blue Devils then held the ball for four minutes and capped their ensuing drive with a 34-yard field goal from Ross Martin.

That concluded the defensive stand half of the game, which stood in stark contrast to the opening frame that featured an offensive shootout. The Blue Devils posted 28 of their points in the first half, and Cutcliffe felt more points were left on the field in the final frame. Duke didn’t play perfectly in any phase of the game, he said, but the performance was good enough to end the two-game losing skid.

Quarterback Brandon Connette continued to look more comfortable in his role, and he finished 20-for-28 for 324 yards and three touchdowns in the air (against just one interception) and added 55 rushing yards and two touchdowns on 17 carries. Josh Snead led Duke with 108 rushing yards, and Jamison Crowder was once again Duke’s primary playmaker, catching seven passes for 149 yards and a score.

“We’re playing with essentially our third quarterback and still playing and gained 514 yards,” Cutcliffe said. “This team is 3-2 the hard way. Nothing’s going to ever be easy, but we’re going to be exciting.”

Keeley: 919-829-4556; Twitter: @laurakeeley

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service