In the news

DNA study: Mummified head didn’t belong to French king

Associated PressOctober 13, 2013 

France  King's Head

This photo from the 1930s shows what was believed to be the head of French King Henri IV. DNA testing now shows the skull belongs to someone else.

ANONYMOUS — AP

Three years ago, French researchers declared that a centuries-old mummified head was that of the beloved King Henri IV. But now a new study says, “Non!”

The original conclusion was based largely on facial reconstruction techniques and signs the skull had injuries similar to those suffered by the monarch. The new study looked at DNA instead.

It found a genetic mismatch between the head and three living male relatives of the 17th century French king. The researchers concluded the head didn’t come from anybody in the royal lineage.

Henri IV, one of France’s best-loved kings, reigned from 1589 to 1610.

It’s “impossible” that the head belongs to Henri IV, said Jean-Jacques Cassiman, an emeritus professor at the University of Leuven, one of the authors of the new study. The research was published online Wednesday in the European Journal of Human Genetics.

The same study also found a blood sample previously attributed to King Louis XVI, one of Henri’s descendants, lacked any royal ties. Louis XVI died on the guillotine during the French Revolution, and many spectators reportedly soaked their handkerchiefs in the king’s blood. But Cassiman and colleagues found the lingering traces of powdered blood on the handkerchief they tested did not match the Bourbon family DNA.

Cassiman said he wasn’t sure whom the head or the blood sample belonged to. The DNA from both failed to match samples from other royal families on record.

Amid the frenzy of the French Revolution, the royal tombs at Saint Denis near Paris were dug up, and some accounts claim that Henri IV’s head got chopped off and stolen. Cassiman and his co-authors dispute that Henri was decapitated and believe the king is still buried in Saint Denis after the tombs were resealed in 1817.

Philippe Charlier, author of the 2010 study that identified the head as Henri IV’s, dismissed the new research. He said he and colleagues have found an exact match between a three-dimensional comparison of the ancient head and Henri IV’s death mask. He said the work will be published soon in a forensic journal.

Charlier added there were numerous doubts about the paternity of various kings in the Bourbon line, which might explain why there was no link between the DNA of modern-day descendants and the ancient head.

“It is hopeless to try to match a family tree and a series of genetic links (over) such a long period,” he said in an email.

Frank Ruehli of the University of Zurich and the Swiss Mummy project agreed there could be questions about paternity in the Bourbon line, and also raised concerns about the authenticity of the ancient DNA samples, as he said it was very difficult to get good data from a sample several centuries old.

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service