Rand Paul's Wikipedia problem

Posted by Dan Barkin on November 5, 2013 

Sen. Rand Paul, who is being talked about as a 2016 presidential candidate, has been accused of including passages from other writers and from Wikipedia in his speeches, a book and an op-ed.

Sounds like bad staff work. And dumb staff work. In the old days, there was probably a lot of, shall we say, “borrowing” that went undetected. Today, there is a lot of technology available to catch it. If you cut and paste something that’s on the web, it’s not hard to be found out.

I am less concerned by the sloppiness of Senator Paul’s office than I am with the senator’s reaction.

He said in an interview with ABC: “I think I’m being unfairly targeted by a bunch of hacks and haters.”

Not the right response. What he should have just said is that I was sloppy and I’ll do better, instead of lashing out about “hacks and haters” at the end of a very long answer to a question from George Stephanopoulos.

News & Observer is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service